I played at an online casino (NV Casino).
The registration process initially went smoothly: I created an account, logged in, and played. During account creation, I had to provide my first and last name, among other things. I didn't enter my full legal name, but only abbreviated versions (the first three letters of my first name and the first two letters of my last name).
This had nothing to do with the later verification process, but was solely for account creation and the display name in the profile. The email address and mobile phone number were correct and legitimate. The reason was simply to handle sensitive personal data with care.
I then made a deposit and initially won nothing.
However, after a second deposit I made a very high profit:
With a stake of €0.60, I achieved a profit of 8,333 times my stake, resulting in a total balance of approximately €5,000 in my account.
When I wanted to withdraw the money, the casino required full verification, which I carried out without any gaps:
Identification document (front and back)
Selfie with ID
Bank statements (including address, rent payment visible)
Bank card (front and back)
I have submitted all requested documents completely and correctly.
After much back and forth, it was finally announced that the verification was complete.
Subsequently, NV Casino informed me that the winnings would not be paid out, on the grounds that I had only provided abbreviations during registration and not my full first and last name.
They only offered to refund the amount I had deposited (partly as a "goodwill" or "loyalty"), but not the winnings of approximately €5,000.
I consider this approach illegitimate.
In my understanding – and also from experience with other online casinos (e.g., Wunderino) – it's not uncommon for the display name or the name provided during registration to differ from the legal name, as long as identity is clearly verified. In these cases, winnings were paid out regularly despite the different names.
However, here the complete, successful verification is subsequently ignored in order to avoid paying out the winnings. To me, this seems like a pretext to evade payment.
The casino is based in Curaçao, which makes legal enforcement more difficult.
My central question to you is therefore:
Is this approach legally permissible – or is it a fraudulent or at least unfair business model?



