Thank you for your feedback. However, your last post once again demonstrates that you are consistently missing the point.
This is not about what players should know in a "heavily regulated market like Austria".
This is about your platform, your responsibility, and the way you advertise online casinos without an Austrian license. Period.
1. Their reference to player knowledge is misleading.
Whether a player knows if a casino is licensed in Austria or not is completely irrelevant.
It is important that you:
- List casinos under the heading "Top Online Casinos Austria - new, reputable & secure",
- These casinos are actively reviewed, recommended, and ranked.
- and deliberately conceal the fact that these providers are operating illegally in Austria.
This is not "neutral information".
This is blatant advertising, specifically for providers who violate applicable law in my country.
2. Their argument regarding "help with problems" is simply unrealistic.
The claim that one can get help at CasinoGuru and that complaints are handled fairly contradicts both my own experience and that of numerous other players.
I myself have filed several complaints, including a clearly documented violation of my self-exclusion.
These complaints were:
- Rejected without sound justification
- with interpretations of rules that are not found in any law,
- and justified with statements that relate exclusively to your own imaginary "guidelines".
Particularly absurd was their reasoning that a casino supposedly has two weeks to implement a subsequent self-exclusion request due to gambling addiction.
I ask you:
In which law, in which regulation, in which court ruling is this stated?
Answer: In none.
These are completely fabricated requirements that you yourselves have set and that would not stand up in any state governed by the rule of law.
So much for the topic of "player protection".
3. Why complaints are often rejected by you – the real problem
- CasinoGuru is an affiliate portal.
- Their sole source of income consists of referring players to online casinos.
- The more players you send to these casinos, the more you earn.
It is inherent in the nature of this business model that you cannot or do not want to compete with large casino operators – because they finance your portal.
This dependency explains:
- why complaints against large providers are regularly rejected
- why unfavorable cases are downplayed or "reinterpreted from a regulatory perspective",
- and why obviously illegal casinos are presented as "reputable" and "recommended" on your platform.
Your denial doesn't make it any less obvious.
4. Their assessments have no legal relevance whatsoever.
They argue that my complaint did not meet the criteria they have established for a valid self-exclusion.
Let me state this clearly:
Their criteria are legally irrelevant.
In Austria, the Supreme Court has already ruled in numerous cases:
- Contracts with unlicensed online casinos are invalid.
- Players are entitled to a full refund of their losses.
- The illegality of the providers alone is sufficient – regardless of self-exclusion, gaming behavior or other circumstances.
If I were to file a complaint with you based on the illegality of the casinos, it would also be rejected by you – not because it was unfounded, but because it did not fit into your affiliate business framework.
5. And finally: The actual purpose of my post
My original post wasn't about CasinoGuru, but about whether anyone has experience with Austrian lawyers or litigation funders who take on such cases.
Instead, I had to deal with a series of false statements, diversionary arguments, and self-invented "rules" on your platform.
Your portal is welcome to continue creating reviews and rankings – but please stop pretending that these are professional, objective, or legally sound.
The Austrian legal situation is clear:
Advertising and brokering illegal online casinos is legally problematic, and your claim that you are merely "informing" is simply untenable in light of your advertising copy.
I hope you will reconsider the way you communicate with Austrian users in the future.
Because reality is different from how you portray it here.