Good Day 4 Play Casino - general discussion (page 2)

i posted a review, is pedning, but yes after search with gemini AI it confrimed the games (at least in pragmatic play ) are 100% clones , also the user jvie789 before 3 years said pragmatic play slots are not original,

its pretty obvious games are not running in pragmatic play official server.

plus an other user complained about hacksaw games too

i asked support

1. about the clone games
2. close my account

and they just said your account is closed, no answer for the fake games.

of course i didnt make any deposit i cant trust site like this.

For example, if ask on stoiximan.gr why do you offer fake slots, they will explain me their slots are original from pragmatic play and the game is fair

on this casino even if i was wrong they just skipped my question, but im pretty sure they are clone slots

Hello there. Thanks for explaining your concerns in more detail. I can understand why this situation raised questions for you, especially if the technical setup looked unusual to you and support did not really address the point you were trying to make.

At the same time, I think it is important to separate concerns, suspicions, and confirmed facts.

You mentioned conclusions based on Gemini AI, browser developer tools, older forum comments, and network observations. Those things can certainly raise questions and be part of a discussion, but they are still external interpretations of what is visible from the user side. Different external checks and tools can sometimes reach different conclusions, which is exactly why we have to be careful with categorical statements such as "100% cloned games", "the games are definitely fake", "RTP can be changed to any level", or "the games are not random".

These are grave claims and would require very strong, independently verifiable evidence.

At the moment, what we have shared appears closer to a technical concern or suspicion than confirmed proof.

Regarding older forum posts or reports from several years ago, we would also suggest some caution. The online gambling industry changes quickly, technical setups evolve, providers change integrations, and information that may have looked relevant years ago is not always reliable evidence today.

I also want to address one specific point about support not answering your question.

To be fair, it is understandable to feel unsatisfied if you raised a serious concern and received only a short response about account closure. That criticism is reasonable.

At the same time, it is worth asking a practical question here:

What would a casino realistically be expected to say to a message such as "your games are fake" based on technical observations and an AI interpretation?

If the games are legitimate, support saying "our games are legitimate" would likely not change your mind because you already seem convinced otherwise. 🙂

If there were an actual issue, no casino would realistically respond by openly confirming something that serious in a customer support chat.

And in many cases, first line customer support simply does not have the technical expertise or authority to explain infrastructure, integrations, or provider delivery systems in detail. A support agent is usually there to help with account issues, payments, KYC, or general gameplay questions, not to investigate technical allegations based on browser network traffic.

So while I understand why the response felt unsatisfying, the lack of a detailed technical explanation from support should not automatically be treated as confirmation that the games are fake.

If I personally were in the position of support and received this concern, I would probably answer something along these lines:

"Thank you for raising your concern. We understand why unusual technical behavior may prompt questions. However, we can confirm that the games offered on our platform are provided through our licensed integrations. Unfortunately, customer support is unable to comment on technical infrastructure or third party delivery systems in detail. If you do not feel comfortable playing, we completely respect your decision and can assist with account closure upon request." 🙂

Would that fully convince someone who already believes the games are fake? Probably not. But it would at least acknowledge the concern instead of simply closing the conversation.

For the same reasons mentioned above, the text submitted as a casino review could not actually be approved as a casino review.

For the forum discussion itself, however, we still need to be careful about presenting suspicions as confirmed facts without strong evidence.