The 3rd party operators featured on this page are featured on a non-commercial basis with no commission arrangements in place. 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

HomeForumCasinosExecution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary

Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 90)

555,793 views 2,702 replies |
4 years ago
|
1...89 90 91...136
Add post
1 year ago
1 year ago
deus

Hi,

Update: 1x appeal

1x MG goes to execution


Well then....

Automatic translation:
1 year ago

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/J/18463/imfname_1626582.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjoh_nomoWGAxXW3gIHHfWHBJIQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2nRADQTdzpZk-MNwg9S0jt

Nichtmitmir
1 year ago
deus

Looks good. Whoever went to this trouble, I hope it has the desired success.

It just doesn't bother anyone, the PF also seems pretty clueless to me. You just don't hear anything, we've been waiting for 4 years now.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Guys, after 10 months I have now received an answer from Goldstein's lawyers, it is interesting what he says and why Austria does not apply something like this file

Automatic translation:
alipirhan
1 year ago
deus

The thing with Bill55 is clear, even if the rubbish has been around for a year and last year they said "it will be collected in record time". The rest... well, I would take it with a grain of salt. As long as there are no concrete practices and evidence of success, it is nothing more than an advertising slogan.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Hello,

Does anyone know anything about the legal issue?


I played with an illegal online provider in Austria and lost sum x. While playing, I was aware that I could claim the sum back. Now I have filed a lawsuit and have a date.

Am I now committing a criminal offense because I acted intentionally? Or can I go to court and not have to worry? Actually, I just want to forget about it and have nothing more to do with it


It is a mid-four-figure sum.


What do you think?

Edited
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

You are not committing a criminal offense, the Supreme Court has already ruled that a claim for reimbursement is possible in this case too.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

thank you. that calms me down a bit

Automatic translation:
player37
1 year ago
Stefan123450
1 year ago

I have to say this is indeed interesting to know:

"The player's knowledge of the invalidity of the obligation at the time of the performance - i.e. at the time of the stake - includes his knowledge of the reclaimability of the performance (given despite the invalidity of the obligation), which means that the plaintiff - due to the purpose of the prohibition already discussed - could not be harmed if he had 'concealed' from the defendant an 'intention' to sue for lost stakes later, which he may have already had when participating in the prohibited game."


The Supreme Court thus makes it clear that neither knowledge of the lack of an Austrian license by the casino provider nor an intention at the time of playing to later reclaim and sue for any losses constitutes an obstacle.


1 year ago
deus

Anybody got any news?

The new GL Law video exudes optimism - at least with regard to Curacao.

https://youtu.be/E-HE3aFh-dk?si=Gdm0Sr562JXL9uXQ


Quick update on my loot box lawsuit, the trial is over and the verdict is expected by the end of June. The lawyer is optimistic.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

From a judgment of 11.7.24 what do you think about this.


The Court considers that this is not an issue that has already been dealt with by the European Court of Justice

Answer to that. It also does not seem that the law is in effect in this case

The community invoked in this case is a legal question that can be decided

from just reading the law without the help of the European Court of Justice.

The matter is sensitive and of national interest and has serious implications

a lot for the online gaming industry in Malta, which is of great importance

for Malta's economy.

The Court is convinced that it is necessary at this stage to refer the request for a preliminary ruling

welcomes the applicant’s request to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice and calls for that application to be processed as soon as possible.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago

https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000224222/kasino-mr-green-zahlt-spielverluste-nicht-zurueck-jetzt-pfaendet-eine-spielerin-die-website

Edited
1 year ago
deus

Great thing, that can be crucial.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Entertaining to read and at the same time sad how creative the lawyers and courts have to be to try to get people to get their money

Edited
Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Interesting article. Something seems to be happening...

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
voizua92
1 year ago
deus

Crazy, I think this is going in the right direction for all of us. Hopefully it will go through, then they will finally pay. Jokerstars too

Automatic translation:
1 year ago

https://www.nachrichten.at/panorama/chronik/spielsuechtiger-bekam-nach-klage-halbe-million-euro-von-wettanbieter;art58,3958982

1...89 90 91...136
Go to pageof 136 pages

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
PP Forum Xmas Competition flash 2025
Share your winnings from Pragmatic Play slots — we’re giving away prizes worth $2,000!

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more

Subscribe to our newsletter for no deposit bonuses, free tournaments, new slots, and more.