Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 90)
Hi,
Update: 1x appeal
1x MG goes to execution
Well then....
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/J/18463/imfname_1626582.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjoh_nomoWGAxXW3gIHHfWHBJIQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2nRADQTdzpZk-MNwg9S0jt
Looks good. Whoever went to this trouble, I hope it has the desired success.
It just doesn't bother anyone, the PF also seems pretty clueless to me. You just don't hear anything, we've been waiting for 4 years now.
Guys, after 10 months I have now received an answer from Goldstein's lawyers, it is interesting what he says and why Austria does not apply something like this 
The thing with Bill55 is clear, even if the rubbish has been around for a year and last year they said "it will be collected in record time". The rest... well, I would take it with a grain of salt. As long as there are no concrete practices and evidence of success, it is nothing more than an advertising slogan.
Hello,
Does anyone know anything about the legal issue?
I played with an illegal online provider in Austria and lost sum x. While playing, I was aware that I could claim the sum back. Now I have filed a lawsuit and have a date.
Am I now committing a criminal offense because I acted intentionally? Or can I go to court and not have to worry? Actually, I just want to forget about it and have nothing more to do with it
It is a mid-four-figure sum.
What do you think?
You are not committing a criminal offense, the Supreme Court has already ruled that a claim for reimbursement is possible in this case too.
thank you. that calms me down a bit
I have to say this is indeed interesting to know:
"The player's knowledge of the invalidity of the obligation at the time of the performance - i.e. at the time of the stake - includes his knowledge of the reclaimability of the performance (given despite the invalidity of the obligation), which means that the plaintiff - due to the purpose of the prohibition already discussed - could not be harmed if he had 'concealed' from the defendant an 'intention' to sue for lost stakes later, which he may have already had when participating in the prohibited game."
The Supreme Court thus makes it clear that neither knowledge of the lack of an Austrian license by the casino provider nor an intention at the time of playing to later reclaim and sue for any losses constitutes an obstacle.
Anybody got any news?
The new GL Law video exudes optimism - at least with regard to Curacao.
https://youtu.be/E-HE3aFh-dk?si=Gdm0Sr562JXL9uXQ
Quick update on my loot box lawsuit, the trial is over and the verdict is expected by the end of June. The lawyer is optimistic.
From a judgment of 11.7.24 what do you think about this.
The Court considers that this is not an issue that has already been dealt with by the European Court of Justice
Answer to that. It also does not seem that the law is in effect in this case
The community invoked in this case is a legal question that can be decided
from just reading the law without the help of the European Court of Justice.
The matter is sensitive and of national interest and has serious implications
a lot for the online gaming industry in Malta, which is of great importance
for Malta's economy.
The Court is convinced that it is necessary at this stage to refer the request for a preliminary ruling
welcomes the applicant’s request to refer the matter to the European Court of Justice and calls for that application to be processed as soon as possible.
https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000224222/kasino-mr-green-zahlt-spielverluste-nicht-zurueck-jetzt-pfaendet-eine-spielerin-die-website
Great thing, that can be crucial.
Entertaining to read and at the same time sad how creative the lawyers and courts have to be to try to get people to get their money
Interesting article. Something seems to be happening...
Crazy, I think this is going in the right direction for all of us. Hopefully it will go through, then they will finally pay. Jokerstars too
https://www.nachrichten.at/panorama/chronik/spielsuechtiger-bekam-nach-klage-halbe-million-euro-von-wettanbieter;art58,3958982
