Dear Matej,
I would like to add one material procedural update while YEET's response is still pending.
My written complaint concerning the protection and payment of the remaining account balance was submitted directly to complaints@yeet.com no later than 16 August 2026. In the same email thread, I expressly stated that the follow-up was a continuation of the existing complaint and "not a new complaint."
YEET's Complaints Policy, dated 29 June 2026, states that YEET will provide a final written response within 30 calendar days of receiving a complaint, including the findings of its investigation and the decision reached.
That 30-day period has now expired.
Even using 17 August 2026, the date of my formal Escalation Request, as the later and more conservative reference date, 30 calendar days have also elapsed.
I have received no final written response containing findings or a decision on the unresolved financial issue. YEET has also not requested any additional information from me in connection with this complaint that would account for an extension under its Complaints Policy.
The Account Deactivation Notice dealt with the permanent status of the account, which I am not challenging. It did not state the balance recorded when access was removed, provide withdrawal instructions, communicate any financial determination concerning that balance, or complete payment.
The evidence supporting this chronology is already in the case file. As you have already confirmed that you have the information you need from me, I am not resubmitting or duplicating any documents unless you request them.
If YEET relies on any material factual position or internal record that may affect the financial resolution of this complaint, I respectfully ask that, before the complaint is finally determined, I be informed of the substance of the position being relied upon and be given an opportunity to respond.
For clarity, I am not asking Casino Guru to reverse or reconsider the permanent closure. I do not want the account reopened, access restored, or any gambling functionality returned. The only unresolved issue is the financial treatment of the account balance reflected in YEET's ledger when access was removed.
If YEET contends that any amount was deducted, withheld, voided, forfeited or is otherwise not payable, I respectfully ask that it provide the complete ledger and accounting trail supporting that position, including:
the account balance before any adjustment relied upon; the balance recorded immediately before access was removed; each relevant ledger entry, adjustment or accounting treatment and the amount affected; the resulting balance or amount YEET says remained payable; the factual finding relied upon; the specific contractual provision relied upon, including its applicable version and effective date; and the applicable legal or regulatory basis.
My requested resolution remains unchanged:
YEET should determine the exact balance recorded in its own ledger immediately before access was removed, pay that complete balance through the established USDT/BSC withdrawal route already provided to it, provide the BSC transaction hash after payment, and keep the account permanently closed.
More than a month has now passed. I am not trying to prolong this dispute or return to gambling. I simply want the outstanding financial issue resolved so I can close this chapter completely and move on from online casinos for good. This is the only remaining issue preventing that.
Thank you,
supertraump
Dear Matej,
I would like to add one material procedural update while YEET's response is still pending.
My written complaint concerning the protection and payment of the remaining account balance was submitted directly to complaints@yeet.com no later than 16 August 2026. In the same email thread, I expressly stated that the follow-up was a continuation of the existing complaint and "not a new complaint."
YEET's Complaints Policy, dated 29 June 2026, states that YEET will provide a final written response within 30 calendar days of receiving a complaint, including the findings of its investigation and the decision reached.
That 30-day period has now expired.
Even using 17 August 2026, the date of my formal Escalation Request, as the later and more conservative reference date, 30 calendar days have also elapsed.
I have received no final written response containing findings or a decision on the unresolved financial issue. YEET has also not requested any additional information from me in connection with this complaint that would account for an extension under its Complaints Policy.
The Account Deactivation Notice dealt with the permanent status of the account, which I am not challenging. It did not state the balance recorded when access was removed, provide withdrawal instructions, communicate any financial determination concerning that balance, or complete payment.
The evidence supporting this chronology is already in the case file. As you have already confirmed that you have the information you need from me, I am not resubmitting or duplicating any documents unless you request them.
If YEET relies on any material factual position or internal record that may affect the financial resolution of this complaint, I respectfully ask that, before the complaint is finally determined, I be informed of the substance of the position being relied upon and be given an opportunity to respond.
For clarity, I am not asking Casino Guru to reverse or reconsider the permanent closure. I do not want the account reopened, access restored, or any gambling functionality returned. The only unresolved issue is the financial treatment of the account balance reflected in YEET's ledger when access was removed.
If YEET contends that any amount was deducted, withheld, voided, forfeited or is otherwise not payable, I respectfully ask that it provide the complete ledger and accounting trail supporting that position, including:
the account balance before any adjustment relied upon; the balance recorded immediately before access was removed; each relevant ledger entry, adjustment or accounting treatment and the amount affected; the resulting balance or amount YEET says remained payable; the factual finding relied upon; the specific contractual provision relied upon, including its applicable version and effective date; and the applicable legal or regulatory basis.
My requested resolution remains unchanged:
YEET should determine the exact balance recorded in its own ledger immediately before access was removed, pay that complete balance through the established USDT/BSC withdrawal route already provided to it, provide the BSC transaction hash after payment, and keep the account permanently closed.
More than a month has now passed. I am not trying to prolong this dispute or return to gambling. I simply want the outstanding financial issue resolved so I can close this chapter completely and move on from online casinos for good. This is the only remaining issue preventing that.
Thank you,
supertraump