I am submitting this complaint concerning Vegazone's handling of repeated responsible gambling disclosures and requests to permanently close my account before I subsequently suffered significant gambling losses.
I want to make clear that I am not seeking reimbursement simply because I lost money gambling. I accept that I subsequently gambled. My complaint concerns what happened before those losses, when I recognised that I was losing control and actively attempted to prevent myself from being able to continue gambling.
Background
I had an assigned Vegazone VIP Manager, Eduard. WhatsApp was an established communication channel through which I had previously communicated directly with him, including only weeks beforehand. I was never informed that WhatsApp had been discontinued or was no longer monitored. Importantly, Vegazone's website continued publicly advertising the ability to contact my VIP Manager via WhatsApp.
I had also previously used Vegazone's "Take a Break" responsible gambling facility on two occasions.
Requests for permanent closure
On 17–18 June, during a period in which I recognised that my gambling was becoming uncontrollable, I contacted my VIP Manager through WhatsApp.
My messages were explicit. I explained that I believed I had a gambling problem, had lost more than I could afford, was attempting to recover losses and feared I would spiral again if the account remained available.
Most importantly, I repeatedly requested that my account be permanently closed.
These were not retrospective statements made after the losses forming this complaint. They were contemporaneous requests for intervention made beforehand, during a period of clarity in which I was trying to protect myself from my subsequent gambling behaviour.
No action was taken on those requests and my account remained available.
Why I reasonably used WhatsApp
Vegazone now relies upon Clause 7.1 of its Terms and Conditions, which states that account closure requests should be submitted to its support email address.
However, WhatsApp was an established channel for communicating directly with my VIP Manager. I had successfully used it shortly beforehand, was never informed it had been discontinued, and Vegazone continued publicly advertising WhatsApp for contacting my VIP Manager.
There is also contemporaneous live-chat evidence showing that I specifically raised that I was not receiving responses through WhatsApp. Despite this, Vegazone's representatives did not tell me that WhatsApp was no longer monitored or that communications sent there would not be actioned.
I therefore had no express notification that an established communication channel, which Vegazone itself continued to advertise, had ceased operating.
Subsequent losses
Approximately one month later, the outcome I had sought to prevent occurred.
During approximately eight hours, I deposited around AUD $100,000 through approximately 80–100 transactions while repeatedly gambling and chasing losses. My account remained operational throughout, with no responsible gambling intervention or welfare contact.
I do not conceal the time between my closure requests and these losses. It is central to my complaint. I requested permanent closure in advance precisely because I recognised that I could subsequently return to gambling and lose control again.
Had the permanent closure I repeatedly requested been implemented, the subsequent gambling through this account could not have occurred.
Vegazone's response
I raised a formal complaint and provided supporting evidence. Vegazone's Compliance Team rejected it, principally relying upon Clause 7.1 and stating that previous use of Take a Break did not create an indefinite monitoring obligation.
However, their Final Response does not adequately address the central evidence.
It does not explain why WhatsApp continued to be publicly advertised for contacting my VIP Manager; why I was never informed that it was no longer monitored; what happened to the responsible gambling disclosures and repeated permanent-closure requests sent there; why live-chat staff did not correct me when I expressly raised difficulties obtaining responses through WhatsApp; or how these circumstances were considered alongside my subsequent gambling escalation.
I therefore ask Casino Guru to independently review whether Vegazone appropriately handled my responsible gambling disclosures and repeated requests for permanent account closure.
I am seeking AUD $75,000 as resolution rather than the entirety of the approximately AUD $100,000 subsequently deposited/lost.
I have retained the WhatsApp communications, live-chat records, website evidence, account history and Compliance correspondence and can provide the complete records if required.
I am submitting this complaint concerning Vegazone's handling of repeated responsible gambling disclosures and requests to permanently close my account before I subsequently suffered significant gambling losses.
I want to make clear that I am not seeking reimbursement simply because I lost money gambling. I accept that I subsequently gambled. My complaint concerns what happened before those losses, when I recognised that I was losing control and actively attempted to prevent myself from being able to continue gambling.
Background
I had an assigned Vegazone VIP Manager, Eduard. WhatsApp was an established communication channel through which I had previously communicated directly with him, including only weeks beforehand. I was never informed that WhatsApp had been discontinued or was no longer monitored. Importantly, Vegazone's website continued publicly advertising the ability to contact my VIP Manager via WhatsApp.
I had also previously used Vegazone's "Take a Break" responsible gambling facility on two occasions.
Requests for permanent closure
On 17–18 June, during a period in which I recognised that my gambling was becoming uncontrollable, I contacted my VIP Manager through WhatsApp.
My messages were explicit. I explained that I believed I had a gambling problem, had lost more than I could afford, was attempting to recover losses and feared I would spiral again if the account remained available.
Most importantly, I repeatedly requested that my account be permanently closed.
These were not retrospective statements made after the losses forming this complaint. They were contemporaneous requests for intervention made beforehand, during a period of clarity in which I was trying to protect myself from my subsequent gambling behaviour.
No action was taken on those requests and my account remained available.
Why I reasonably used WhatsApp
Vegazone now relies upon Clause 7.1 of its Terms and Conditions, which states that account closure requests should be submitted to its support email address.
However, WhatsApp was an established channel for communicating directly with my VIP Manager. I had successfully used it shortly beforehand, was never informed it had been discontinued, and Vegazone continued publicly advertising WhatsApp for contacting my VIP Manager.
There is also contemporaneous live-chat evidence showing that I specifically raised that I was not receiving responses through WhatsApp. Despite this, Vegazone's representatives did not tell me that WhatsApp was no longer monitored or that communications sent there would not be actioned.
I therefore had no express notification that an established communication channel, which Vegazone itself continued to advertise, had ceased operating.
Subsequent losses
Approximately one month later, the outcome I had sought to prevent occurred.
During approximately eight hours, I deposited around AUD $100,000 through approximately 80–100 transactions while repeatedly gambling and chasing losses. My account remained operational throughout, with no responsible gambling intervention or welfare contact.
I do not conceal the time between my closure requests and these losses. It is central to my complaint. I requested permanent closure in advance precisely because I recognised that I could subsequently return to gambling and lose control again.
Had the permanent closure I repeatedly requested been implemented, the subsequent gambling through this account could not have occurred.
Vegazone's response
I raised a formal complaint and provided supporting evidence. Vegazone's Compliance Team rejected it, principally relying upon Clause 7.1 and stating that previous use of Take a Break did not create an indefinite monitoring obligation.
However, their Final Response does not adequately address the central evidence.
It does not explain why WhatsApp continued to be publicly advertised for contacting my VIP Manager; why I was never informed that it was no longer monitored; what happened to the responsible gambling disclosures and repeated permanent-closure requests sent there; why live-chat staff did not correct me when I expressly raised difficulties obtaining responses through WhatsApp; or how these circumstances were considered alongside my subsequent gambling escalation.
I therefore ask Casino Guru to independently review whether Vegazone appropriately handled my responsible gambling disclosures and repeated requests for permanent account closure.
I am seeking AUD $75,000 as resolution rather than the entirety of the approximately AUD $100,000 subsequently deposited/lost.
I have retained the WhatsApp communications, live-chat records, website evidence, account history and Compliance correspondence and can provide the complete records if required.