I am submitting this complaint regarding Trueluck Casino's decision to confiscate my entire balance of €4,137.82 based on allegations of fraudulent or prohibited activity.
Trueluck informed me that my funds had been confiscated due to alleged violations of Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 of their Terms and Conditions.
The problem is that these provisions cover a very broad range of completely different activities, including fraud, collusion, cheating, software-assisted play, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party betting, VPN/proxy usage, and other allegedly improper conduct.
I asked Trueluck several times to clarify what I had actually done.
I specifically explained that simply quoting the Terms and Conditions does not tell me what conduct was supposedly detected. I asked them to identify the specific activity involved, the type of violation, the relevant gameplay/session, and whether the accusation concerned collusion, fraudulent activity, VPN/proxy usage, third-party activity, software-assisted play, or something else.
Despite these requests, Trueluck has repeatedly refused to provide any specific explanation.
Instead, their support team has now essentially sent me the same response three times, repeatedly quoting Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 and stating that their responsible team "detected violations."
Even after I explicitly asked them not to simply quote the same Terms and Conditions again, they did exactly that.
I strongly deny engaging in collusion, cheating, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party play, fraudulent activity, or any other manipulation of gameplay.
I understand that a casino may not be able to disclose every detail of its internal fraud-detection systems directly to a player. However, I do not believe that a casino should be able to confiscate a player's entire €4,137.82 balance merely by citing several broad Terms and Conditions without even identifying what the player allegedly did.
If Trueluck has genuine evidence supporting such a serious accusation, I would like them to provide the relevant evidence and a detailed explanation to Casino Guru for independent review. I understand that sensitive evidence may, where appropriate, be provided privately to Casino Guru rather than publicly disclosed to me.
I am fully willing to cooperate with Casino Guru and provide my communication with Trueluck or any other information necessary for the investigation.
I therefore respectfully ask Casino Guru to investigate this case and request that Trueluck substantiate its allegations.
If Trueluck cannot provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that I committed a serious violation warranting confiscation, I believe my €4,137.82 balance should be restored and made available for withdrawal.
Thank you for your assistance.
I am submitting this complaint regarding Trueluck Casino's decision to confiscate my entire balance of €4,137.82 based on allegations of fraudulent or prohibited activity.
Trueluck informed me that my funds had been confiscated due to alleged violations of Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 of their Terms and Conditions.
The problem is that these provisions cover a very broad range of completely different activities, including fraud, collusion, cheating, software-assisted play, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party betting, VPN/proxy usage, and other allegedly improper conduct.
I asked Trueluck several times to clarify what I had actually done.
I specifically explained that simply quoting the Terms and Conditions does not tell me what conduct was supposedly detected. I asked them to identify the specific activity involved, the type of violation, the relevant gameplay/session, and whether the accusation concerned collusion, fraudulent activity, VPN/proxy usage, third-party activity, software-assisted play, or something else.
Despite these requests, Trueluck has repeatedly refused to provide any specific explanation.
Instead, their support team has now essentially sent me the same response three times, repeatedly quoting Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 and stating that their responsible team "detected violations."
Even after I explicitly asked them not to simply quote the same Terms and Conditions again, they did exactly that.
I strongly deny engaging in collusion, cheating, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party play, fraudulent activity, or any other manipulation of gameplay.
I understand that a casino may not be able to disclose every detail of its internal fraud-detection systems directly to a player. However, I do not believe that a casino should be able to confiscate a player's entire €4,137.82 balance merely by citing several broad Terms and Conditions without even identifying what the player allegedly did.
If Trueluck has genuine evidence supporting such a serious accusation, I would like them to provide the relevant evidence and a detailed explanation to Casino Guru for independent review. I understand that sensitive evidence may, where appropriate, be provided privately to Casino Guru rather than publicly disclosed to me.
I am fully willing to cooperate with Casino Guru and provide my communication with Trueluck or any other information necessary for the investigation.
I therefore respectfully ask Casino Guru to investigate this case and request that Trueluck substantiate its allegations.
If Trueluck cannot provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that I committed a serious violation warranting confiscation, I believe my €4,137.82 balance should be restored and made available for withdrawal.
Thank you for your assistance.