Hello Chaz2004941,
I'm Michal, and I have taken over your complaint. I have reviewed this case, and I will contact the casino to shed more light on this matter and to see if I can help somehow.
We would like to invite Smash Casino to join the conversation.
Dear Smash Casino,
While we acknowledge that, as per the industry standards, it is the responsibility of each player to review and comply with the applicable bonus terms prior to participation, however, relying solely on players to interpret and adhere to at times extensive lists of restricted games is not considered a sufficiently user-friendly or effective safeguard.
As part of our efforts to promote a fair and transparent gaming environment for both players and operators, we take the view that where restricted games remain freely accessible without clear and enforced limitations, the subsequent voiding of winnings may not align with fair and transparent practices.
In particular, if a game is available to the player without any visible or system-enforced restriction—and the player has not actively bypassed any stated limitations—then, provided no other rules have been breached, the resulting winnings should be honored. This does not apply in cases where bonuses are explicitly limited to specific games or where restrictions are clearly and prominently communicated and enforced.
With this in mind, I would kindly encourage you to review the circumstances of this case once again and consider whether a more balanced resolution may be appropriate. I remain open to further discussion and cooperation in order to reach a mutually acceptable outcome.
If there are any additional factors relevant to this case that maybe cannot be disclosed publicly, please feel free to share them directly with me at michal.k@casino.guru
Hello Chaz2004941,
I'm Michal, and I have taken over your complaint. I have reviewed this case, and I will contact the casino to shed more light on this matter and to see if I can help somehow.
We would like to invite Smash Casino to join the conversation.
Dear Smash Casino,
While we acknowledge that, as per the industry standards, it is the responsibility of each player to review and comply with the applicable bonus terms prior to participation, however, relying solely on players to interpret and adhere to at times extensive lists of restricted games is not considered a sufficiently user-friendly or effective safeguard.
As part of our efforts to promote a fair and transparent gaming environment for both players and operators, we take the view that where restricted games remain freely accessible without clear and enforced limitations, the subsequent voiding of winnings may not align with fair and transparent practices.
In particular, if a game is available to the player without any visible or system-enforced restriction—and the player has not actively bypassed any stated limitations—then, provided no other rules have been breached, the resulting winnings should be honored. This does not apply in cases where bonuses are explicitly limited to specific games or where restrictions are clearly and prominently communicated and enforced.
With this in mind, I would kindly encourage you to review the circumstances of this case once again and consider whether a more balanced resolution may be appropriate. I remain open to further discussion and cooperation in order to reach a mutually acceptable outcome.
If there are any additional factors relevant to this case that maybe cannot be disclosed publicly, please feel free to share them directly with me at michal.k@casino.guru