Dear Matej,
Hope you're having wonderful day.
Thank you very much for your continued support and for carefully reviewing the PDF file. I’m relieved to hear that the form I submitted was indeed filled out correctly, and that the issue arose from a technical display problem when opened in certain browsers. I appreciate you forwarding screenshots and asking the casino to recheck this.
That said, I must raise a more fundamental concern:
The casino should never have required a signed PDF form in order to close my account after I clearly requested permanent self-exclusion due to gambling addiction on May 30, 2025.
As you rightly pointed out in your earlier message, gambling addicts are not in control of their compulsive behaviour, and delaying protective measures due to excessive formalities can lead to serious harm. That is exactly what happened in my case.
Instead of closing my account or disabling deposits and gameplay immediately, the casino kept it fully open—for nearly two weeks—until June 11, when they acted only after your intervention via Casino Guru. During this time, I lost $2,345, which could have been completely avoided if even basic precautionary steps had been taken after my initial request.
The requirement to complete a 3-page PDF form before providing protection not only creates barriers for vulnerable players, but—as you rightly noted—is not industry standard and is not aligned with your Fair Gambling Codex. It’s the first time I’ve seen such an approach, and I believe it places the burden on the person most at risk.
The casino now admits they are updating their process to put accounts in withdrawal-only mode in such cases—proving their previous approach was flawed. Also they closed my account when you asked to close it only and when this complaint raised.
While I understand the casino may wish to keep documentation for legal reasons, that should not come at the expense of player safety. The correct procedure would have been to immediately freeze or restrict the account, and sort out the paperwork after ensuring no further harm could occur.
In light of all this, I respectfully ask that my refund request for $2,345 (could be more) be seriously reconsidered. I took all reasonable steps to request closure due to addiction. It was the casino's process—and its delay—that caused this loss.
Thank you again for standing up for fairness, and I look forward to your continued assistance.
P.S. I haven't received my transactions history yet.
Dear Matej,
Hope you're having wonderful day.
Thank you very much for your continued support and for carefully reviewing the PDF file. I’m relieved to hear that the form I submitted was indeed filled out correctly, and that the issue arose from a technical display problem when opened in certain browsers. I appreciate you forwarding screenshots and asking the casino to recheck this.
That said, I must raise a more fundamental concern:
The casino should never have required a signed PDF form in order to close my account after I clearly requested permanent self-exclusion due to gambling addiction on May 30, 2025.
As you rightly pointed out in your earlier message, gambling addicts are not in control of their compulsive behaviour, and delaying protective measures due to excessive formalities can lead to serious harm. That is exactly what happened in my case.
Instead of closing my account or disabling deposits and gameplay immediately, the casino kept it fully open—for nearly two weeks—until June 11, when they acted only after your intervention via Casino Guru. During this time, I lost $2,345, which could have been completely avoided if even basic precautionary steps had been taken after my initial request.
The requirement to complete a 3-page PDF form before providing protection not only creates barriers for vulnerable players, but—as you rightly noted—is not industry standard and is not aligned with your Fair Gambling Codex. It’s the first time I’ve seen such an approach, and I believe it places the burden on the person most at risk.
The casino now admits they are updating their process to put accounts in withdrawal-only mode in such cases—proving their previous approach was flawed. Also they closed my account when you asked to close it only and when this complaint raised.
While I understand the casino may wish to keep documentation for legal reasons, that should not come at the expense of player safety. The correct procedure would have been to immediately freeze or restrict the account, and sort out the paperwork after ensuring no further harm could occur.
In light of all this, I respectfully ask that my refund request for $2,345 (could be more) be seriously reconsidered. I took all reasonable steps to request closure due to addiction. It was the casino's process—and its delay—that caused this loss.
Thank you again for standing up for fairness, and I look forward to your continued assistance.
P.S. I haven't received my transactions history yet.