I played at SkyHills.com, operated by **EOD Code SRL (Corporate ID 3-101-910497). After
developing gambling-related harm, I formally informed SkyHills of my diagnosed gambling
addiction and requested permanent self-exclusion across the operator and its license/group.
Despite this, while in a vulnerable state and following marketing exposure, I registered and
deposited at SambaSlots.com, which is operated by the same legal entity: EOD Code SRL,
Corporate ID 3-101-910497.
The operator already had full knowledge of my gambling addiction and self-exclusion
request, yet still allowed registration, deposits, and gambling at SambaSlots. This represents
a clear failure of responsible gambling duty and cross-brand self-exclusion, which
Casino.Guru has previously recognized as grounds for refund when the same company is
involved.
I do not dispute losses at SkyHills prior to exclusion. However, I request a full refund of all
deposits made at SambaSlots.com, as these losses occurred after exclusion and due to the
operator’s failure to protect a self-excluded, vulnerable player. I agreed to 80% of the net
losses as a settle of agreement, but I have not heard from Sambaslots since then, they have
completely ignored my e-mails, and our contact on other encrypted apps, such as telegram.
TLDR:
Same company (EOD Code SRL) – I self-excluded at SkyHills due to diagnosed gambling
addiction – operator allowed me to play and deposit at sister site SambaSlots – requesting
refund of all SambaSlots deposits due to failed cross-brand self-exclusion.
I played at SkyHills.com, operated by **EOD Code SRL (Corporate ID 3-101-910497). After
developing gambling-related harm, I formally informed SkyHills of my diagnosed gambling
addiction and requested permanent self-exclusion across the operator and its license/group.
Despite this, while in a vulnerable state and following marketing exposure, I registered and
deposited at SambaSlots.com, which is operated by the same legal entity: EOD Code SRL,
Corporate ID 3-101-910497.
The operator already had full knowledge of my gambling addiction and self-exclusion
request, yet still allowed registration, deposits, and gambling at SambaSlots. This represents
a clear failure of responsible gambling duty and cross-brand self-exclusion, which
Casino.Guru has previously recognized as grounds for refund when the same company is
involved.
I do not dispute losses at SkyHills prior to exclusion. However, I request a full refund of all
deposits made at SambaSlots.com, as these losses occurred after exclusion and due to the
operator’s failure to protect a self-excluded, vulnerable player. I agreed to 80% of the net
losses as a settle of agreement, but I have not heard from Sambaslots since then, they have
completely ignored my e-mails, and our contact on other encrypted apps, such as telegram.
TLDR:
Same company (EOD Code SRL) – I self-excluded at SkyHills due to diagnosed gambling
addiction – operator allowed me to play and deposit at sister site SambaSlots – requesting
refund of all SambaSlots deposits due to failed cross-brand self-exclusion.