Dear Martin and Casino Guru Team,
Thank you for sharing the response provided by RX Casino.
I must formally challenge the position presented by the casino, as it remains entirely unsubstantiated and procedurally insufficient.
RX Casino claims that my account was flagged due to "network anomalies," "connection inconsistencies," and "elevated fraud-risk indicators." However, these statements are purely generic and lack any verifiable evidence. At no point have they provided:
- IP logs
- Device fingerprints
- Specific timestamps
- Any demonstrable link to VPN usage or anonymization tools
- Any evidence of multi-accounting or coordinated activity
The casino is effectively asking this process to accept unverified internal conclusions as proof, which is not acceptable under principles of fairness and dispute resolution standards.
I explicitly deny:
- Any use of VPN, proxy, or anonymization tools
- Any manipulation of connection parameters
- Any form of fraudulent or prohibited activity
Furthermore, it is important to highlight that:
- I played exclusively slots, with no advantage play or irregular patterns.
- The winnings were obtained through a bonus that was fully wagered and released in compliance with the rules.
- The account had undergone verification (KYC) without issue prior to the confiscation.
The casino’s reliance on "internal risk systems" without transparency effectively removes any possibility for the player to defend themselves. If no evidence is disclosed, then there is no way to verify whether the conclusions are accurate, proportional, or even applicable to my account.
Citing "security sensitivity" cannot justify a complete lack of evidence, especially in a case involving the confiscation of €1,867 in legitimate winnings.
At a minimum, the casino should be required to provide verifiable and reviewable evidence to a neutral third party (Casino Guru), even if such data cannot be fully disclosed publicly.
Without such evidence, this action must be considered arbitrary and unjustified.
Therefore, I respectfully request that:
- RX Casino provides concrete and verifiable evidence supporting their claims.
- If such evidence cannot be provided, the confiscation should be deemed unjustified.
- The €1,867 be paid in full, as the winnings were obtained in compliance with the Terms and Conditions.
Thank you for your assistance and for ensuring a fair and transparent resolution process.
Kind regards,
TedFrnk1988
Dear Martin and Casino Guru Team,
Thank you for sharing the response provided by RX Casino.
I must formally challenge the position presented by the casino, as it remains entirely unsubstantiated and procedurally insufficient.
RX Casino claims that my account was flagged due to "network anomalies," "connection inconsistencies," and "elevated fraud-risk indicators." However, these statements are purely generic and lack any verifiable evidence. At no point have they provided:
- IP logs
- Device fingerprints
- Specific timestamps
- Any demonstrable link to VPN usage or anonymization tools
- Any evidence of multi-accounting or coordinated activity
The casino is effectively asking this process to accept unverified internal conclusions as proof, which is not acceptable under principles of fairness and dispute resolution standards.
I explicitly deny:
- Any use of VPN, proxy, or anonymization tools
- Any manipulation of connection parameters
- Any form of fraudulent or prohibited activity
Furthermore, it is important to highlight that:
- I played exclusively slots, with no advantage play or irregular patterns.
- The winnings were obtained through a bonus that was fully wagered and released in compliance with the rules.
- The account had undergone verification (KYC) without issue prior to the confiscation.
The casino’s reliance on "internal risk systems" without transparency effectively removes any possibility for the player to defend themselves. If no evidence is disclosed, then there is no way to verify whether the conclusions are accurate, proportional, or even applicable to my account.
Citing "security sensitivity" cannot justify a complete lack of evidence, especially in a case involving the confiscation of €1,867 in legitimate winnings.
At a minimum, the casino should be required to provide verifiable and reviewable evidence to a neutral third party (Casino Guru), even if such data cannot be fully disclosed publicly.
Without such evidence, this action must be considered arbitrary and unjustified.
Therefore, I respectfully request that:
- RX Casino provides concrete and verifiable evidence supporting their claims.
- If such evidence cannot be provided, the confiscation should be deemed unjustified.
- The €1,867 be paid in full, as the winnings were obtained in compliance with the Terms and Conditions.
Thank you for your assistance and for ensuring a fair and transparent resolution process.
Kind regards,
TedFrnk1988
Edited by a Casino Guru admin