Dear Casino.Guru Team,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide clarification regarding this complaint.
First of all, we would like to note that this matter has already been subject to a detailed complaint review by AskGamblers. During that review, both parties were given the opportunity to provide their explanations and supporting evidence, including the materials submitted by the player concerning the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. Following its review, AskGamblers ruled in RoyalSea’s favor and closed the complaint as resolved.
For its part, the Company has repeatedly conducted internal reviews of the available communication history with the player. Based on the results of these reviews, RoyalSea cannot confirm receipt of the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. The message is not present in the Company’s official mailbox and was not registered or processed by our Support Team on that date.
During the previous complaint review, the player provided Gmail screenshots and subsequently also provided a file in .eml format, which he stated had been downloaded directly from Gmail as the original message.
The Company conducted a technical analysis of the provided file. The file contained only a limited set of headers:
* MIME-Version;
* Date;
* Message-ID;
* Subject;
* From;
* To;
* Content-Type.
At the same time, the provided file did not contain technical server data that would allow the actual transmission path of the disputed message through the mail infrastructure to be established and its acceptance by the recipient’s system to be confirmed, including the Received header chain, Return-Path, DKIM-Signature / X-Google-DKIM-Signature, Authentication-Results / ARC-Authentication-Results, X-Received, Delivered-To, and other relevant technical headers.
Therefore, the materials provided do not allow it to be technically established that the disputed message of June 11 was actually transmitted to and accepted by RoyalSea’s mail system.
The player also referred to Gmail displaying the status "Delivered after 0 seconds" and to the absence of any bounce-back or delivery failure notification. However, these circumstances alone do not establish that the specific message was received and processed by RoyalSea’s mail infrastructure.
For comparison, the player’s subsequent communication dated June 28, 2026 was actually received by the Company, as confirmed by our available communication history. Following receipt of the relevant communication, the player’s gaming account was blocked on June 28, 2026. No comparable confirmation of receipt of the alleged June 11 email was found in the Company’s systems.
As part of the previous complaint review, the AskGamblers administration was also provided with screenshots from RoyalSea’s official corporate mailbox showing the available email correspondence with the player.
After reviewing the materials submitted by both parties, AskGamblers concluded that RoyalSea had acted in accordance with its Terms and Conditions. In particular, the review took into account that the casino had not received the disputed email of June 11, 2026, and that once the relevant communication was received on June 28, 2026, the player’s account was blocked.
We understand that Casino.Guru conducts its own independent assessment of complaints. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcome of the previous review is directly relevant to the present case, as it concerns the same player, the same alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026, and substantially the same evidence and circumstances that have already been reviewed in detail by another independent complaint resolution platform.
Accordingly, we cannot agree with the player’s allegation that RoyalSea received his self-exclusion request on June 11, 2026 and thereafter knowingly continued to allow him to use his gaming account. The key point is that the Company’s receipt of the disputed June 11 email has not been established, and the message is absent from RoyalSea’s official mailbox.
If necessary, the Company is prepared to provide Casino.Guru privately with the available supporting materials, including the relevant screenshots from the corporate mailbox, materials from the previous complaint review, the .eml file submitted by the player, and the final AskGamblers decision.
We respectfully ask that these circumstances and the available evidence be taken into consideration when reviewing this complaint.
Kind regards,
RoyalSea Administration
Dear Casino.Guru Team,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide clarification regarding this complaint.
First of all, we would like to note that this matter has already been subject to a detailed complaint review by AskGamblers. During that review, both parties were given the opportunity to provide their explanations and supporting evidence, including the materials submitted by the player concerning the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. Following its review, AskGamblers ruled in RoyalSea’s favor and closed the complaint as resolved.
For its part, the Company has repeatedly conducted internal reviews of the available communication history with the player. Based on the results of these reviews, RoyalSea cannot confirm receipt of the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. The message is not present in the Company’s official mailbox and was not registered or processed by our Support Team on that date.
During the previous complaint review, the player provided Gmail screenshots and subsequently also provided a file in .eml format, which he stated had been downloaded directly from Gmail as the original message.
The Company conducted a technical analysis of the provided file. The file contained only a limited set of headers:
* MIME-Version;
* Date;
* Message-ID;
* Subject;
* From;
* To;
* Content-Type.
At the same time, the provided file did not contain technical server data that would allow the actual transmission path of the disputed message through the mail infrastructure to be established and its acceptance by the recipient’s system to be confirmed, including the Received header chain, Return-Path, DKIM-Signature / X-Google-DKIM-Signature, Authentication-Results / ARC-Authentication-Results, X-Received, Delivered-To, and other relevant technical headers.
Therefore, the materials provided do not allow it to be technically established that the disputed message of June 11 was actually transmitted to and accepted by RoyalSea’s mail system.
The player also referred to Gmail displaying the status "Delivered after 0 seconds" and to the absence of any bounce-back or delivery failure notification. However, these circumstances alone do not establish that the specific message was received and processed by RoyalSea’s mail infrastructure.
For comparison, the player’s subsequent communication dated June 28, 2026 was actually received by the Company, as confirmed by our available communication history. Following receipt of the relevant communication, the player’s gaming account was blocked on June 28, 2026. No comparable confirmation of receipt of the alleged June 11 email was found in the Company’s systems.
As part of the previous complaint review, the AskGamblers administration was also provided with screenshots from RoyalSea’s official corporate mailbox showing the available email correspondence with the player.
After reviewing the materials submitted by both parties, AskGamblers concluded that RoyalSea had acted in accordance with its Terms and Conditions. In particular, the review took into account that the casino had not received the disputed email of June 11, 2026, and that once the relevant communication was received on June 28, 2026, the player’s account was blocked.
We understand that Casino.Guru conducts its own independent assessment of complaints. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcome of the previous review is directly relevant to the present case, as it concerns the same player, the same alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026, and substantially the same evidence and circumstances that have already been reviewed in detail by another independent complaint resolution platform.
Accordingly, we cannot agree with the player’s allegation that RoyalSea received his self-exclusion request on June 11, 2026 and thereafter knowingly continued to allow him to use his gaming account. The key point is that the Company’s receipt of the disputed June 11 email has not been established, and the message is absent from RoyalSea’s official mailbox.
If necessary, the Company is prepared to provide Casino.Guru privately with the available supporting materials, including the relevant screenshots from the corporate mailbox, materials from the previous complaint review, the .eml file submitted by the player, and the final AskGamblers decision.
We respectfully ask that these circumstances and the available evidence be taken into consideration when reviewing this complaint.
Kind regards,
RoyalSea Administration