Hello Shaunalatham and Peter,
Thank you for your patience and for bringing this matter to our attention.
Following an additional internal review, we would like to note that this case turned out to be quite complex due to the amount of related gameplay, transactions, and balance movements involved.
We can confirm that the initial balance correction was applied in accordance with the maximum withdrawal rule related to the bonus from which part of the winnings had originally been generated.
However, after revisiting the calculations and overall gameplay flow, we identified that the confiscation was initially processed incorrectly in terms of the amounts applied.
Taking this into consideration, as well as the player’s overall activity, we have decided as a gesture of goodwill to restore the previously confiscated funds.
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused during the review process and appreciate everyone’s patience while this matter was being rechecked.
We hope this helps resolve the complaint.
Hello Shaunalatham and Peter,
Thank you for your patience and for bringing this matter to our attention.
Following an additional internal review, we would like to note that this case turned out to be quite complex due to the amount of related gameplay, transactions, and balance movements involved.
We can confirm that the initial balance correction was applied in accordance with the maximum withdrawal rule related to the bonus from which part of the winnings had originally been generated.
However, after revisiting the calculations and overall gameplay flow, we identified that the confiscation was initially processed incorrectly in terms of the amounts applied.
Taking this into consideration, as well as the player’s overall activity, we have decided as a gesture of goodwill to restore the previously confiscated funds.
We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused during the review process and appreciate everyone’s patience while this matter was being rechecked.
We hope this helps resolve the complaint.