I self-excluded from Rollbit on my main account because I had a gambling problem. While that self-exclusion was still active, I was able to register a new account under the same legal identity. Rollbit ran its KYC identity verification on the new account, matched it against the same ID documents already on file, approved it, and allowed me to deposit and gamble. I lost money and self-excluded again. The same thing then happened a second and a third time: each new account was created during an active self-exclusion period, passed Rollbit's KYC against the same verified identity, was approved by Rollbit, and was allowed to deposit and play leading to over 120,000$+ net loss in 2 weeks.
Rollbit's own Responsible Gaming policy states that a self-excluded player may not create a new account during the exclusion period. Because Rollbit carried out KYC each time and matched every new account to the same verified identity and ID documents already linked to a self-excluded account, its own systems had every opportunity to detect and block the re-registration — and failed to do so on three separate occasions. The purpose of KYC and self-exclusion is to make this technically enforceable; Rollbit verified exactly who I was each time and let me back in regardless.
I raised this with Rollbit directly. Their compliance team acknowledged my email and asked me to submit a formal complaint with supporting details, which I have done. However, they indicated a 20-business-day response window, whereas responsible-gaming complaints under the Curaçao framework are to be handled within 5 business days.
Resolution I am seeking:
- A refund of my net losses (deposits minus withdrawals) on every account created and used while a self-exclusion was active.
- Permanent closure and permanent block of all accounts linked to my identity and KYC documents.
- Preservation of all my KYC records, account logs, deposit and withdrawal history, betting history, chat/email logs, and self-exclusion records.
I self-excluded from Rollbit on my main account because I had a gambling problem. While that self-exclusion was still active, I was able to register a new account under the same legal identity. Rollbit ran its KYC identity verification on the new account, matched it against the same ID documents already on file, approved it, and allowed me to deposit and gamble. I lost money and self-excluded again. The same thing then happened a second and a third time: each new account was created during an active self-exclusion period, passed Rollbit's KYC against the same verified identity, was approved by Rollbit, and was allowed to deposit and play leading to over 120,000$+ net loss in 2 weeks.
Rollbit's own Responsible Gaming policy states that a self-excluded player may not create a new account during the exclusion period. Because Rollbit carried out KYC each time and matched every new account to the same verified identity and ID documents already linked to a self-excluded account, its own systems had every opportunity to detect and block the re-registration — and failed to do so on three separate occasions. The purpose of KYC and self-exclusion is to make this technically enforceable; Rollbit verified exactly who I was each time and let me back in regardless.
I raised this with Rollbit directly. Their compliance team acknowledged my email and asked me to submit a formal complaint with supporting details, which I have done. However, they indicated a 20-business-day response window, whereas responsible-gaming complaints under the Curaçao framework are to be handled within 5 business days.
Resolution I am seeking:
- A refund of my net losses (deposits minus withdrawals) on every account created and used while a self-exclusion was active.
- Permanent closure and permanent block of all accounts linked to my identity and KYC documents.
- Preservation of all my KYC records, account logs, deposit and withdrawal history, betting history, chat/email logs, and self-exclusion records.