Thank you for your reply.
I understand your frustration regarding the situation. However, in order for us to assess whether there was a breach of responsible gambling procedures, we need to verify that your original account closure request was specifically made due to gambling addiction or gambling-related concerns.
At the moment, we only have access to the communication from February 28, where you requested the account to be closed again after it had already been reopened. Based on the emails provided, the casino responded to your request promptly and your account was blocked on the same day. Because of this, we currently do not see evidence of a responsible gambling breach in relation to that request.
Unfortunately, without the original self-exclusion request, we are unable to confirm under what circumstances your account was initially closed, whether gambling addiction was explicitly mentioned, or whether the casino failed to apply permanent responsible gambling restrictions at that time.
For now, based on the available evidence, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted against responsible gambling principles or that the deposits made on February 28 should be refunded.
Thank you for your reply.
I understand your frustration regarding the situation. However, in order for us to assess whether there was a breach of responsible gambling procedures, we need to verify that your original account closure request was specifically made due to gambling addiction or gambling-related concerns.
At the moment, we only have access to the communication from February 28, where you requested the account to be closed again after it had already been reopened. Based on the emails provided, the casino responded to your request promptly and your account was blocked on the same day. Because of this, we currently do not see evidence of a responsible gambling breach in relation to that request.
Unfortunately, without the original self-exclusion request, we are unable to confirm under what circumstances your account was initially closed, whether gambling addiction was explicitly mentioned, or whether the casino failed to apply permanent responsible gambling restrictions at that time.
For now, based on the available evidence, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted against responsible gambling principles or that the deposits made on February 28 should be refunded.