Dear casino representative,
thank you for providing the player’s betting history. As I have mentioned in the thread, based on the data available, I was able to identify only one instance where the maximum bet rule appears to have been breached. At the same time, the betting history shows that the player placed a very large number of other bets which complied with the maximum stake limitation.
In such cases, we assess the situation in line with our Fair Gambling Codex, particularly whether an isolated breach may have been unintentional (for example, a missclick during regular play). If the maximum bet was exceeded only once among thousands of compliant bets, this would generally not justify the confiscation of all bonus-related winnings.
In case you believe this breach was intentional and calculated, please let me know here or at martin.l@casino.guru. Otherwise, we believe the fair course of action is to reinstate the bonus to a state before the violation occurred.
Dear casino representative,
thank you for providing the player’s betting history. As I have mentioned in the thread, based on the data available, I was able to identify only one instance where the maximum bet rule appears to have been breached. At the same time, the betting history shows that the player placed a very large number of other bets which complied with the maximum stake limitation.
In such cases, we assess the situation in line with our Fair Gambling Codex, particularly whether an isolated breach may have been unintentional (for example, a missclick during regular play). If the maximum bet was exceeded only once among thousands of compliant bets, this would generally not justify the confiscation of all bonus-related winnings.
In case you believe this breach was intentional and calculated, please let me know here or at martin.l@casino.guru. Otherwise, we believe the fair course of action is to reinstate the bonus to a state before the violation occurred.