Dear Kake,
You might not have paid your full attention to my previous response. Let me clarify a few points for you.
"What do you mean by relatively new to casino playing?
On what basis do you say that?"
You have been playing in Razed Casino for only a few days, right? So you were relatively new in this casino, right?
I don't understand why people say they have deposited large amounts of money when their financial resources vary.
Even when it comes to betting amounts, people who can rank high in betting tournaments don't bet as much.
Yes, it's true that financial resources vary between players. For example $100 can mean a significant amount for one person, but it might not be so significant for another, but in general, it is not typical when a "new player" deposit quite a significant amount during such a relatively short time frame in a casino that they have not "tested" yet. The casino team's careful approach in regards to your account is quite understandable here.
The reason I chose this blackjack is that there are very few video blackjacks to begin with.
Also, I don't like live blackjack because it's slow and I feel like the outcome depends on the actions of the players in front of me.
I would recommend checking, but there is almost no video blackjack available with any other provider.
I just played from those few games.
It is of course absolutely your decision which games you like and which you want to play as long as there a no restrictions in place in regards an active bonus (deposit bonus, cashback, rakeback, etc.), certain game provider or game genre country restrictions or any other restrictions that are required by the local authorities.
I had a quick look at the "Blackjack" game offered by Razed Casino, and I could see this.

Although most could be "live BlackJack games" because these are the most popular with most players, there are a few others as well. This is just to provide an example.
When a friend recommended it to me, he told me that you can make side bets with this game.
My friend also said that he likes to do this as a side bet sometimes as a fun element.
I'm not the type to do side bets that often, and I was banned straight away so I couldn't do it, but I was thinking maybe I'd try it as an additional element and as a new form of gambling someday, but as you said, I was banned straight away so I ended up not being able to do it.
It is nothing unusual to refer to certain casinos, bonuses or games between friends, this is very common and in some casinos even encouraged. This, on its own, is nothing bad, and the similar gameplay should not pose any problem if it was just about this.
The problem at hand, as noted by the casino team previously, is that both you and your friend have obtained rewards via the same or strikingly similar gameplay that are currently perceived as disproportionately high compared to what you should have received. This situation, as indicated, constitutes a violation of the casino regulations that you consented to upon establishing your account.
This behaviour has been flagged only in your and your friends' accounts, which implies that it may not be a mere coincidence but rather a calculated strategy.
At this moment, I cannot offer a definitive conclusion regarding your case, as I'm awaiting further information and evidence I have already asked for from the casino team to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the entire situation.
I hope to give you an update shortly.
Dear Connor / Razed Casino team,
I am anticipating your reply to my most recent email and am looking forward to receiving the supplementary evidence.
Dear Kake,
You might not have paid your full attention to my previous response. Let me clarify a few points for you.
"What do you mean by relatively new to casino playing?
On what basis do you say that?"
You have been playing in Razed Casino for only a few days, right? So you were relatively new in this casino, right?
I don't understand why people say they have deposited large amounts of money when their financial resources vary.
Even when it comes to betting amounts, people who can rank high in betting tournaments don't bet as much.
Yes, it's true that financial resources vary between players. For example $100 can mean a significant amount for one person, but it might not be so significant for another, but in general, it is not typical when a "new player" deposit quite a significant amount during such a relatively short time frame in a casino that they have not "tested" yet. The casino team's careful approach in regards to your account is quite understandable here.
The reason I chose this blackjack is that there are very few video blackjacks to begin with.
Also, I don't like live blackjack because it's slow and I feel like the outcome depends on the actions of the players in front of me.
I would recommend checking, but there is almost no video blackjack available with any other provider.
I just played from those few games.
It is of course absolutely your decision which games you like and which you want to play as long as there a no restrictions in place in regards an active bonus (deposit bonus, cashback, rakeback, etc.), certain game provider or game genre country restrictions or any other restrictions that are required by the local authorities.
I had a quick look at the "Blackjack" game offered by Razed Casino, and I could see this.

Although most could be "live BlackJack games" because these are the most popular with most players, there are a few others as well. This is just to provide an example.
When a friend recommended it to me, he told me that you can make side bets with this game.
My friend also said that he likes to do this as a side bet sometimes as a fun element.
I'm not the type to do side bets that often, and I was banned straight away so I couldn't do it, but I was thinking maybe I'd try it as an additional element and as a new form of gambling someday, but as you said, I was banned straight away so I ended up not being able to do it.
It is nothing unusual to refer to certain casinos, bonuses or games between friends, this is very common and in some casinos even encouraged. This, on its own, is nothing bad, and the similar gameplay should not pose any problem if it was just about this.
The problem at hand, as noted by the casino team previously, is that both you and your friend have obtained rewards via the same or strikingly similar gameplay that are currently perceived as disproportionately high compared to what you should have received. This situation, as indicated, constitutes a violation of the casino regulations that you consented to upon establishing your account.
This behaviour has been flagged only in your and your friends' accounts, which implies that it may not be a mere coincidence but rather a calculated strategy.
At this moment, I cannot offer a definitive conclusion regarding your case, as I'm awaiting further information and evidence I have already asked for from the casino team to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the entire situation.
I hope to give you an update shortly.
Dear Connor / Razed Casino team,
I am anticipating your reply to my most recent email and am looking forward to receiving the supplementary evidence.