Dear Petra,
Thank you for your reply and for looking into my case.
Regarding the VPN usage:
I did use NordVPN connected through Japan. However, before using the VPN, I did not specifically ask the casino for permission because the website itself clearly stated that it was "VPN friendly." I was simply using a normal commercial VPN service (NordVPN), not any tool intended to hide fraudulent activity.
In addition, during my previous gameplay and withdrawals, everything worked normally without any warnings or restrictions from the casino. I was able to successfully withdraw approximately USD 60,000 before this issue occurred.
Regarding KYC:
The website stated that KYC was not required, and I was never asked to complete KYC verification. However, if KYC verification is necessary, I am fully willing to cooperate and provide any required documents.
Regarding my country of residence:
Players from my country are able to access and play on the website. Blackjack was also accessible from my location. In fact, there were times when I played without using a VPN and accessed the site directly using my home IP address without any issue.
As for the account closure itself, the casino never provided any specific explanation or evidence regarding what exact rule I allegedly violated.
They only sent me a general email listing a large number of Terms of Use clauses related to fraud, collusion, multiple accounts, unfair advantage, third-party software, etc., but they did not identify which specific action I supposedly committed.
I would also like to emphasize that:
I did not create multiple accounts.
I did not collude with anyone.
I did not use bots, scripts, or third-party software.
I did not participate in arbitrage groups or cheating activities.
I only played RNG blackjack.
Even if the casino believes that my VPN usage violated their policies, I feel that permanently confiscating approximately USD 140,000 without providing clear evidence or a detailed explanation is extremely unfair.
At minimum, I believe my deposited funds and legitimate balance should be returned.
Thank you again for your assistance and time.
Dear Petra,
Thank you for your reply and for looking into my case.
Regarding the VPN usage:
I did use NordVPN connected through Japan. However, before using the VPN, I did not specifically ask the casino for permission because the website itself clearly stated that it was "VPN friendly." I was simply using a normal commercial VPN service (NordVPN), not any tool intended to hide fraudulent activity.
In addition, during my previous gameplay and withdrawals, everything worked normally without any warnings or restrictions from the casino. I was able to successfully withdraw approximately USD 60,000 before this issue occurred.
Regarding KYC:
The website stated that KYC was not required, and I was never asked to complete KYC verification. However, if KYC verification is necessary, I am fully willing to cooperate and provide any required documents.
Regarding my country of residence:
Players from my country are able to access and play on the website. Blackjack was also accessible from my location. In fact, there were times when I played without using a VPN and accessed the site directly using my home IP address without any issue.
As for the account closure itself, the casino never provided any specific explanation or evidence regarding what exact rule I allegedly violated.
They only sent me a general email listing a large number of Terms of Use clauses related to fraud, collusion, multiple accounts, unfair advantage, third-party software, etc., but they did not identify which specific action I supposedly committed.
I would also like to emphasize that:
I did not create multiple accounts.
I did not collude with anyone.
I did not use bots, scripts, or third-party software.
I did not participate in arbitrage groups or cheating activities.
I only played RNG blackjack.
Even if the casino believes that my VPN usage violated their policies, I feel that permanently confiscating approximately USD 140,000 without providing clear evidence or a detailed explanation is extremely unfair.
At minimum, I believe my deposited funds and legitimate balance should be returned.
Thank you again for your assistance and time.