Hello everyone,
Dear ekansh9981,
It's nice to e-meet you. My name is Samuel, and I'll be assisting you with your complaint from now on.
I have reviewed the information available in the complaint so far, and I will now continue investigating this matter with the casino. If there have been any updates or new developments since your last message, please feel free to share them with me.
Dear Parimatch Casino,
thank you for your response. However, at this stage, your explanation is too general for me to properly assess whether the confiscation of the player's balance was justified.
Simply referring to Rule 88 and stating that the account violated your internal compliance and security procedures is not sufficient for the purposes of our investigation.
I kindly ask you to provide a more detailed explanation of:
- the specific reason why the player's account was considered to be in breach of Rule 88;
- what conduct or activity led to the decision to terminate the player's account and confiscate the remaining balance;
- what objective evidence supports this conclusion.
If the supporting evidence contains sensitive information or internal security data that cannot be disclosed publicly, you are welcome to send it directly to my email at samuel.s@casino.guru. Please note that Casino Guru routinely reviews confidential evidence from both casinos and players, and any information shared with us will be treated confidentially.
I look forward to your reply before proceeding with my assessment.
Thank you both for your cooperation.
Hello everyone,
Dear ekansh9981,
It's nice to e-meet you. My name is Samuel, and I'll be assisting you with your complaint from now on.
I have reviewed the information available in the complaint so far, and I will now continue investigating this matter with the casino. If there have been any updates or new developments since your last message, please feel free to share them with me.
Dear Parimatch Casino,
thank you for your response. However, at this stage, your explanation is too general for me to properly assess whether the confiscation of the player's balance was justified.
Simply referring to Rule 88 and stating that the account violated your internal compliance and security procedures is not sufficient for the purposes of our investigation.
I kindly ask you to provide a more detailed explanation of:
- the specific reason why the player's account was considered to be in breach of Rule 88;
- what conduct or activity led to the decision to terminate the player's account and confiscate the remaining balance;
- what objective evidence supports this conclusion.
If the supporting evidence contains sensitive information or internal security data that cannot be disclosed publicly, you are welcome to send it directly to my email at samuel.s@casino.guru. Please note that Casino Guru routinely reviews confidential evidence from both casinos and players, and any information shared with us will be treated confidentially.
I look forward to your reply before proceeding with my assessment.
Thank you both for your cooperation.