Dear Matej and Gdd577!
We thank you for your observations and the opportunity to provide clarification regarding the application of Clause 7.3 of our Responsible Gambling Policy, specifically concerning the seven-day waiting period for deposit-limit increases.
Clause 7.3 of our Responsible Gambling Policy provides that:
"Deposit-limit increases are subject to a standard seven-day waiting period. The Operator may, at its discretion, implement the increase earlier where it is satisfied that the request was player-initiated, confirmed, and consistent with responsible gambling principles."
This clause is designed to ensure a balance between player protection and player autonomy in managing personal gambling controls. It also establishes that the Operator retains limited discretion to apply an earlier implementation where the system confirms that the request has been made voluntarily and without any indicators of at-risk behaviour.
Following a detailed review of system records and communication logs, Onlywin Casino confirms that:
The deposit-limit increase was entirely initiated by the player via the Responsible Gaming interface within their verified account.
The player completed an obligatory confirmation process, which included submitting and verifying the change.
Under these conditions, and in accordance with Clause 7.3, the system recognized the request as a confirmed, player-initiated action and therefore processed it immediately pursuant to the discretionary provision within the same clause.
It is important to note that this was not an operational error nor a deviation from the responsible gambling framework. The system acted in compliance with the rule that allows implementation "where the request was player-initiated, confirmed, and consistent with responsible gambling principles."
The deposit-limit system remains an integral component of Onlywin Casino’s Responsible Gambling Program. Its objective is to allow players to proactively manage their gaming activity while ensuring protection against impulsive or excessive play.
Thus, while Clause 7.3 grants discretionary flexibility, its application is strictly controlled and monitored through the safeguards. This ensures that player protection remains central to every operational decision.
In summary:
The seven-day period referred to in Clause 7.3 serves as the standard rule.
However, discretionary implementation is permitted where the player’s request is clearly self-initiated and consistent with responsible gambling principles.
In this specific case, all conditions for discretionary application were met.
The Operator’s actions were fully compliant with both the Responsible Gambling Policy and the Terms and Conditions.
Onlywin Casino remains committed to maintaining transparent, responsible, and compliant operational standards and welcomes Casino Guru’s continued dialogue in this regard.
Best regards,
OnlyWin Team
Dear Matej and Gdd577!
We thank you for your observations and the opportunity to provide clarification regarding the application of Clause 7.3 of our Responsible Gambling Policy, specifically concerning the seven-day waiting period for deposit-limit increases.
Clause 7.3 of our Responsible Gambling Policy provides that:
"Deposit-limit increases are subject to a standard seven-day waiting period. The Operator may, at its discretion, implement the increase earlier where it is satisfied that the request was player-initiated, confirmed, and consistent with responsible gambling principles."
This clause is designed to ensure a balance between player protection and player autonomy in managing personal gambling controls. It also establishes that the Operator retains limited discretion to apply an earlier implementation where the system confirms that the request has been made voluntarily and without any indicators of at-risk behaviour.
Following a detailed review of system records and communication logs, Onlywin Casino confirms that:
The deposit-limit increase was entirely initiated by the player via the Responsible Gaming interface within their verified account.
The player completed an obligatory confirmation process, which included submitting and verifying the change.
Under these conditions, and in accordance with Clause 7.3, the system recognized the request as a confirmed, player-initiated action and therefore processed it immediately pursuant to the discretionary provision within the same clause.
It is important to note that this was not an operational error nor a deviation from the responsible gambling framework. The system acted in compliance with the rule that allows implementation "where the request was player-initiated, confirmed, and consistent with responsible gambling principles."
The deposit-limit system remains an integral component of Onlywin Casino’s Responsible Gambling Program. Its objective is to allow players to proactively manage their gaming activity while ensuring protection against impulsive or excessive play.
Thus, while Clause 7.3 grants discretionary flexibility, its application is strictly controlled and monitored through the safeguards. This ensures that player protection remains central to every operational decision.
In summary:
The seven-day period referred to in Clause 7.3 serves as the standard rule.
However, discretionary implementation is permitted where the player’s request is clearly self-initiated and consistent with responsible gambling principles.
In this specific case, all conditions for discretionary application were met.
The Operator’s actions were fully compliant with both the Responsible Gambling Policy and the Terms and Conditions.
Onlywin Casino remains committed to maintaining transparent, responsible, and compliant operational standards and welcomes Casino Guru’s continued dialogue in this regard.
Best regards,
OnlyWin Team