Dear Casino Guru Complaints Team,
I am writing to provide additional clarification regarding my complaint against NineCasino
First, I confirm that I have now received the €2,000 in question. However, it is essential to clarify how this occurred.
For more than two and a half months, my funds remained immobilised. During this entire period, NineCasino repeatedly instructed me to "please wait" and assured me that the matter was under review. Despite my numerous follow-ups, no concrete action appeared to be taken on their side.
Ultimately, I personally contacted their payment provider directly. Remarkably, one day after I reached out to the provider myself, the €2,000 was refunded.
This clearly demonstrates that the funds were recoverable and that action could have been taken earlier. It was not my responsibility to intervene with a third-party provider contracted by the casino. The burden of resolving payment issues with their own service providers should fall entirely on the operator, not the player.
As a result of this situation, I suffered several prejudices:
Immobilisation of €2,000 for over two and a half months;
Suspension of my account during that same period;
Repeated efforts and time spent chasing support;
Personal intervention required to recover my own funds;
Loss of lottery tickets and promotional opportunities during suspension;
Refusal of the previously discussed 120% bonus (up to €1,500);
Imposition of a €5,000 monthly deposit limit without transparent justification.
Regarding the deposit limit, NineCasino claims it is related to internal "account history concerns," although:
My responsible gambling assessment results are compliant;
The restriction was imposed despite my VIP status;
No clear or objective explanation has been provided.
They also refuse any form of compensation, arguing that withdrawals remained technically available during suspension. However, the practical reality is that my funds were blocked for months, and I was prevented from normal use of my account.
In summary, although the €2,000 has now been refunded, the underlying issues remain:
Excessive and unjustified delay in resolving a payment issue;
Failure to act until I personally intervened;
Lack of transparency regarding restrictive measures;
Refusal to provide any proportional compensation for the prejudice suffered.
I am therefore requesting your assistance in reviewing whether the operator’s conduct complies with fair gaming standards and player protection principles.
I remain available to provide any supporting documentation if required.
Kind regards,
Mâlik Schreiber
Dear Casino Guru Complaints Team,
I am writing to provide additional clarification regarding my complaint against NineCasino
First, I confirm that I have now received the €2,000 in question. However, it is essential to clarify how this occurred.
For more than two and a half months, my funds remained immobilised. During this entire period, NineCasino repeatedly instructed me to "please wait" and assured me that the matter was under review. Despite my numerous follow-ups, no concrete action appeared to be taken on their side.
Ultimately, I personally contacted their payment provider directly. Remarkably, one day after I reached out to the provider myself, the €2,000 was refunded.
This clearly demonstrates that the funds were recoverable and that action could have been taken earlier. It was not my responsibility to intervene with a third-party provider contracted by the casino. The burden of resolving payment issues with their own service providers should fall entirely on the operator, not the player.
As a result of this situation, I suffered several prejudices:
Immobilisation of €2,000 for over two and a half months;
Suspension of my account during that same period;
Repeated efforts and time spent chasing support;
Personal intervention required to recover my own funds;
Loss of lottery tickets and promotional opportunities during suspension;
Refusal of the previously discussed 120% bonus (up to €1,500);
Imposition of a €5,000 monthly deposit limit without transparent justification.
Regarding the deposit limit, NineCasino claims it is related to internal "account history concerns," although:
My responsible gambling assessment results are compliant;
The restriction was imposed despite my VIP status;
No clear or objective explanation has been provided.
They also refuse any form of compensation, arguing that withdrawals remained technically available during suspension. However, the practical reality is that my funds were blocked for months, and I was prevented from normal use of my account.
In summary, although the €2,000 has now been refunded, the underlying issues remain:
Excessive and unjustified delay in resolving a payment issue;
Failure to act until I personally intervened;
Lack of transparency regarding restrictive measures;
Refusal to provide any proportional compensation for the prejudice suffered.
I am therefore requesting your assistance in reviewing whether the operator’s conduct complies with fair gaming standards and player protection principles.
I remain available to provide any supporting documentation if required.
Kind regards,
Mâlik Schreiber