First, I would like to thank the MoonWin.com Casino for providing additional details regarding this case.
Dear Dragan1989, after reading through all the screenshots you have sent me, and comparing them with the evidence provided by the casino, it seems like there is nothing more I can mediate. Let me explain:
- Your account closure requests
Although you have requested the account closure numerous times, the reason is never clearly stated. Therefore, all such requests are considered as "regular", which means you - as a player - had no gambling addiction. Continuing this logic - if you are not addicted, it means you could simply stop depositing and playing at the casino, unsubscribe from marketing communication or in the worst case - block the e-mail domains and phone numbers sending you promotional offers. If you do continue deposit and play, it is assumed you do this of your own, free will. It's the same as if you had a bad experience in a restaurant and stopped going there for your meals. Due to this, all the regular account closure requests are not considered as valid evidence regarding your case.
- Self-exclusion due to gambling addiction
As per the casino's evidence, the first time you had mentioned having gambling addiction was on 4th November. However, this request has been cancelled by yourself on the same day, when you told the live chat you are not addicted, and requested a bonus in exchange for keeping the account open. Your next self-exclusion requests were sent on 21st and 24th November. Despite this, the casino decided to take your initial request made on 4th November as the one that should have been actioned, which is commendable on their part. As such (taking into consideration the time it takes to process such request), the refund value I would propose to the casino is all the deposits made between the time the account should have been closed until the actual account closure, minus an withdrawals made in this time.
You have sent me a screenshot of the message the casino has sent you regarding the refund. It clearly stated the sum of your deposits and withdrawals made in the aforementioned time period, and they requested your payment details for processing. Since you confirmed reception of the money, it means instead of challenging the sum, you have agreed to the refund amount and responded with the banking details.
Your account should now be closed and marketing communication should cease. Unless you make me aware of this not being the truth, or receiving unwanted marketing communication from other casinos in this group, the self-exclusion part of the mediation is over.
If you have a proof that you have deposited way more money between the self-exclusion request and the account closure, I can speak with the casino representative and request your cashier history for evaluation. However, the casino will not be forced to oblige, as you have already agreed to the refund amount proposed by them previously, so I can't guarantee a different outcome.
Overall, this case seems to be at the point where all that's left to do is to close it. I will keep it open until the end of the week, to give you a chance to ask questions in case I did not explain something properly, or if you have any more issues to raise against the MoonWin Casino. Thank you for your understanding.
First, I would like to thank the MoonWin.com Casino for providing additional details regarding this case.
Dear Dragan1989, after reading through all the screenshots you have sent me, and comparing them with the evidence provided by the casino, it seems like there is nothing more I can mediate. Let me explain:
- Your account closure requests
Although you have requested the account closure numerous times, the reason is never clearly stated. Therefore, all such requests are considered as "regular", which means you - as a player - had no gambling addiction. Continuing this logic - if you are not addicted, it means you could simply stop depositing and playing at the casino, unsubscribe from marketing communication or in the worst case - block the e-mail domains and phone numbers sending you promotional offers. If you do continue deposit and play, it is assumed you do this of your own, free will. It's the same as if you had a bad experience in a restaurant and stopped going there for your meals. Due to this, all the regular account closure requests are not considered as valid evidence regarding your case.
- Self-exclusion due to gambling addiction
As per the casino's evidence, the first time you had mentioned having gambling addiction was on 4th November. However, this request has been cancelled by yourself on the same day, when you told the live chat you are not addicted, and requested a bonus in exchange for keeping the account open. Your next self-exclusion requests were sent on 21st and 24th November. Despite this, the casino decided to take your initial request made on 4th November as the one that should have been actioned, which is commendable on their part. As such (taking into consideration the time it takes to process such request), the refund value I would propose to the casino is all the deposits made between the time the account should have been closed until the actual account closure, minus an withdrawals made in this time.
You have sent me a screenshot of the message the casino has sent you regarding the refund. It clearly stated the sum of your deposits and withdrawals made in the aforementioned time period, and they requested your payment details for processing. Since you confirmed reception of the money, it means instead of challenging the sum, you have agreed to the refund amount and responded with the banking details.
Your account should now be closed and marketing communication should cease. Unless you make me aware of this not being the truth, or receiving unwanted marketing communication from other casinos in this group, the self-exclusion part of the mediation is over.
If you have a proof that you have deposited way more money between the self-exclusion request and the account closure, I can speak with the casino representative and request your cashier history for evaluation. However, the casino will not be forced to oblige, as you have already agreed to the refund amount proposed by them previously, so I can't guarantee a different outcome.
Overall, this case seems to be at the point where all that's left to do is to close it. I will keep it open until the end of the week, to give you a chance to ask questions in case I did not explain something properly, or if you have any more issues to raise against the MoonWin Casino. Thank you for your understanding.