Dear hellokitty123,
Thank you for your reply and for providing additional details regarding your case.
When reviewing self-exclusion-related complaints, we need to assess whether all necessary steps of the self-exclusion process were properly completed. In this case, we have not received any evidence confirming that you replied to the casino’s email requesting confirmation of your decision to close the account.
Based on the communication provided, the casino contacted you on 4 June and asked you to confirm your account closure request. However, we have not seen any confirmation from your side until 10 June, when you contacted the casino again. Following this communication, your account was closed on 12 June, which we consider to be within a reasonable timeframe.
While we understand your argument that your account had only a small remaining balance and that you had already expressed your intention to close the account, the casino had requested confirmation of your decision, and this step was not completed within the reviewed timeframe.
For the above reasons, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to follow your self-exclusion request or that a refund of your subsequent deposits would be justified based on the evidence available.
Unfortunately, due to the lack of confirmation of your self-exclusion request and the fact that the account was closed shortly after you completed the required communication with the casino, we are unable to support your complaint. Therefore, this complaint will now be rejected.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear hellokitty123,
Thank you for your reply and for providing additional details regarding your case.
When reviewing self-exclusion-related complaints, we need to assess whether all necessary steps of the self-exclusion process were properly completed. In this case, we have not received any evidence confirming that you replied to the casino’s email requesting confirmation of your decision to close the account.
Based on the communication provided, the casino contacted you on 4 June and asked you to confirm your account closure request. However, we have not seen any confirmation from your side until 10 June, when you contacted the casino again. Following this communication, your account was closed on 12 June, which we consider to be within a reasonable timeframe.
While we understand your argument that your account had only a small remaining balance and that you had already expressed your intention to close the account, the casino had requested confirmation of your decision, and this step was not completed within the reviewed timeframe.
For the above reasons, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to follow your self-exclusion request or that a refund of your subsequent deposits would be justified based on the evidence available.
Unfortunately, due to the lack of confirmation of your self-exclusion request and the fact that the account was closed shortly after you completed the required communication with the casino, we are unable to support your complaint. Therefore, this complaint will now be rejected.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
