Dear Mania Casino,
Thank you for all the information and the evidence related to this case.
Dear Sonhokoy827,
Thank you for your patience while I was reviewing the case.
While I have not received all the information and evidence I initially requested from the casino, the materials that were made available and subsequently reviewed indicate that the casino has acted in accordance with its Terms and Conditions.
I acknowledge your point that similar gameplay had previously resulted in successful withdrawals. However, it is important to note that casinos often conduct more comprehensive reviews of gameplay at specific stages—most commonly upon submission of a withdrawal request, particularly where certain thresholds are met, or internal risk indicators are triggered. It is therefore very likely that your gameplay was subject to a more detailed assessment at that stage, during which the casino identified patterns it considered to fall under clause 7.3 of its Terms and Conditions. While this may appear inconsistent from your perspective, such reviews are, in fact, very common within the industry.
Furthermore, a key aspect of this case is your explicit acknowledgment of a rule breach. As per your statement in the communication with the casino team:
I confirm that I understand that I were at fault by breaching the bonus rule that the complaint will be considered resolved from my side, please proceed with the £1000 withdrawl.
While I do not exclude the possibility that your decision may have been influenced by the circumstances you described, it is not possible to objectively determine whether this was indeed the case or whether the situation was presented in a way intended to prompt at least some payment from the casino. Nevertheless, once a settlement has been reached and accepted, it is expected that it is upheld by both parties.
In light of the above, and despite the less-than-ideal circumstances, the combination of the identified rule breach and your acceptance of the settlement prevents any further action on our side. As such, the complaint will now have to be closed as Rejected.
Should you remain convinced that the rules were not violated—despite your prior acknowledgment—and believe you are entitled to additional funds, you may consider pursuing the matter with the casino’s licensing authority or another competent authority within your jurisdiction. Unfortunately, we are not in a position to provide further assistance in this regard.
If you do proceed with such action, I would appreciate it if you could inform me of the outcome at michal.k@casino.guru.
For future reference, I strongly recommend carefully reviewing and adhering to all applicable casino rules to help avoid similar situations.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please feel free to reach out—we will try our best to assist.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Dear Mania Casino,
Thank you for all the information and the evidence related to this case.
Dear Sonhokoy827,
Thank you for your patience while I was reviewing the case.
While I have not received all the information and evidence I initially requested from the casino, the materials that were made available and subsequently reviewed indicate that the casino has acted in accordance with its Terms and Conditions.
I acknowledge your point that similar gameplay had previously resulted in successful withdrawals. However, it is important to note that casinos often conduct more comprehensive reviews of gameplay at specific stages—most commonly upon submission of a withdrawal request, particularly where certain thresholds are met, or internal risk indicators are triggered. It is therefore very likely that your gameplay was subject to a more detailed assessment at that stage, during which the casino identified patterns it considered to fall under clause 7.3 of its Terms and Conditions. While this may appear inconsistent from your perspective, such reviews are, in fact, very common within the industry.
Furthermore, a key aspect of this case is your explicit acknowledgment of a rule breach. As per your statement in the communication with the casino team:
I confirm that I understand that I were at fault by breaching the bonus rule that the complaint will be considered resolved from my side, please proceed with the £1000 withdrawl.
While I do not exclude the possibility that your decision may have been influenced by the circumstances you described, it is not possible to objectively determine whether this was indeed the case or whether the situation was presented in a way intended to prompt at least some payment from the casino. Nevertheless, once a settlement has been reached and accepted, it is expected that it is upheld by both parties.
In light of the above, and despite the less-than-ideal circumstances, the combination of the identified rule breach and your acceptance of the settlement prevents any further action on our side. As such, the complaint will now have to be closed as Rejected.
Should you remain convinced that the rules were not violated—despite your prior acknowledgment—and believe you are entitled to additional funds, you may consider pursuing the matter with the casino’s licensing authority or another competent authority within your jurisdiction. Unfortunately, we are not in a position to provide further assistance in this regard.
If you do proceed with such action, I would appreciate it if you could inform me of the outcome at michal.k@casino.guru.
For future reference, I strongly recommend carefully reviewing and adhering to all applicable casino rules to help avoid similar situations.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please feel free to reach out—we will try our best to assist.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Edited by a Casino Guru admin