Lucky Dreams refused and voided my withdrawals totaling approximately CAD 21,000. The casino says this was because I allegedly breached an 8 CAD maximum-bet rule while a bonus was active.
I dispute this explanation. I did not knowingly activate or play with bonus money or free spins when the disputed winnings were generated. My understanding was that I was playing with deposited real-money funds.
Before the significant win, I was betting approximately CAD 2 per spin. I have contemporaneous evidence showing a CA$2.00 bet associated with a CA$20,538.00 win. The casino has nevertheless relied on certain CAD 20 and CAD 30 transactions as evidence of a maximum-bet violation.
I have asked Lucky Dreams to provide the account-specific evidence showing when the alleged bonus was activated, which deposit triggered it, whether the disputed wagers were made with bonus or real-money funds, the exact wager/session records relied upon, and how the casino calculated the confiscation. I have not received a satisfactory explanation supported by the complete underlying records.
The disputed withdrawals were approximately CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 3,000, totaling CAD 21,000.
Lucky Dreams has treated its decision as final despite my requests for clarification and supporting records. I have also attempted to escalate the matter through the ADR/regulatory channels.
I am asking Casino Guru to independently review the evidence and, in particular, determine whether the alleged bonus was actually active during the disputed play, what the CAD 20/CAD 30 transactions represent, whether they were bonus or real-money wagers, and whether the casino's confiscation of approximately CAD 21,000 is supported by the underlying account and game records.
I can provide the casino's correspondence, withdrawal records, screenshots, DSAR/account records, and other
Lucky Dreams refused and voided my withdrawals totaling approximately CAD 21,000. The casino says this was because I allegedly breached an 8 CAD maximum-bet rule while a bonus was active.
I dispute this explanation. I did not knowingly activate or play with bonus money or free spins when the disputed winnings were generated. My understanding was that I was playing with deposited real-money funds.
Before the significant win, I was betting approximately CAD 2 per spin. I have contemporaneous evidence showing a CA$2.00 bet associated with a CA$20,538.00 win. The casino has nevertheless relied on certain CAD 20 and CAD 30 transactions as evidence of a maximum-bet violation.
I have asked Lucky Dreams to provide the account-specific evidence showing when the alleged bonus was activated, which deposit triggered it, whether the disputed wagers were made with bonus or real-money funds, the exact wager/session records relied upon, and how the casino calculated the confiscation. I have not received a satisfactory explanation supported by the complete underlying records.
The disputed withdrawals were approximately CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 6,000 + CAD 3,000, totaling CAD 21,000.
Lucky Dreams has treated its decision as final despite my requests for clarification and supporting records. I have also attempted to escalate the matter through the ADR/regulatory channels.
I am asking Casino Guru to independently review the evidence and, in particular, determine whether the alleged bonus was actually active during the disputed play, what the CAD 20/CAD 30 transactions represent, whether they were bonus or real-money wagers, and whether the casino's confiscation of approximately CAD 21,000 is supported by the underlying account and game records.
I can provide the casino's correspondence, withdrawal records, screenshots, DSAR/account records, and other