Dear lili41,
The casino team has provided me with certain information and evidence that raises valid questions, which may partially clarify their actions. However, despite my repeated requests, the casino team has not supplied the additional information and evidence necessary for me to conduct an independent and thorough assessment of the situation.
Consequently, we are currently unable to support the casino’s actions, and it appears that the confiscation of your winnings is unjustified at this time.
According to the information provided by the casino, your account was flagged by its security team for the use of proxy IP addresses, which is prohibited under Rule 12.10, as previously communicated to you by the casino.
However, from our perspective at Casino Guru, the reasoning provided so far does not appear sufficiently substantiated to justify such a significant action as the confiscation of winnings. In particular, no evidence has been presented to us indicating that the use of proxy IP addresses resulted in any unfair advantage, or other conduct that would materially justify the severity of the action taken.
The IPs were most likely assigned to you by your internet provider, as you, as a customer, have no influence over this. While players can manage their use of VPNs (if this were the case, but it is NOT), proxy IPs are configured by the ISP (Internet Service Provider) even without the player's knowledge, making it unjust for the casino to penalize you for something beyond your control.
I have conveyed our stance on such matters to the casino team and provided our insight on how such a situation could be handled, but regrettably, they have maintained their original position. Unfortunately, we are left with no choice but to consider this complaint closed as Unresolved—Against Fair Gambling.
I understand that this is not the outcome you were hoping for, but we believe that the decrease in the casino’s rating due to unresolved complaints may encourage them to reassess their approach. Should the casino choose to respond and resolve the matter, we will reopen your complaint and notify you via email.
I do hope the gaming authority will review your case and potentially align with our view. Depending on the outcome of their assessment, they may be in a position to challenge the casino’s decision or encourage further review of the matter. However, this falls well beyond our capabilities and authority.
Going forward, I can only recommend carefully reviewing a casino’s reputation, licensing, and player feedback before signing up, and choosing well-licensed and highly rated operators to reduce the risk of similar situations in the future.
I am sorry that I could not be of more assistance in this matter.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Dear lili41,
The casino team has provided me with certain information and evidence that raises valid questions, which may partially clarify their actions. However, despite my repeated requests, the casino team has not supplied the additional information and evidence necessary for me to conduct an independent and thorough assessment of the situation.
Consequently, we are currently unable to support the casino’s actions, and it appears that the confiscation of your winnings is unjustified at this time.
According to the information provided by the casino, your account was flagged by its security team for the use of proxy IP addresses, which is prohibited under Rule 12.10, as previously communicated to you by the casino.
However, from our perspective at Casino Guru, the reasoning provided so far does not appear sufficiently substantiated to justify such a significant action as the confiscation of winnings. In particular, no evidence has been presented to us indicating that the use of proxy IP addresses resulted in any unfair advantage, or other conduct that would materially justify the severity of the action taken.
The IPs were most likely assigned to you by your internet provider, as you, as a customer, have no influence over this. While players can manage their use of VPNs (if this were the case, but it is NOT), proxy IPs are configured by the ISP (Internet Service Provider) even without the player's knowledge, making it unjust for the casino to penalize you for something beyond your control.
I have conveyed our stance on such matters to the casino team and provided our insight on how such a situation could be handled, but regrettably, they have maintained their original position. Unfortunately, we are left with no choice but to consider this complaint closed as Unresolved—Against Fair Gambling.
I understand that this is not the outcome you were hoping for, but we believe that the decrease in the casino’s rating due to unresolved complaints may encourage them to reassess their approach. Should the casino choose to respond and resolve the matter, we will reopen your complaint and notify you via email.
I do hope the gaming authority will review your case and potentially align with our view. Depending on the outcome of their assessment, they may be in a position to challenge the casino’s decision or encourage further review of the matter. However, this falls well beyond our capabilities and authority.
Going forward, I can only recommend carefully reviewing a casino’s reputation, licensing, and player feedback before signing up, and choosing well-licensed and highly rated operators to reduce the risk of similar situations in the future.
I am sorry that I could not be of more assistance in this matter.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru