Guten Tag
Hier wäre sonst noch die Mail die ich an das Support Team geschrieben habe. Leider habe ich diesbezüglich auch keine Antwort erhalten.
Dear Support Team,
I would like to request a review of my withdrawal, as I believe there has been a misunderstanding regarding the application of the 200% non-sticky bonus.
I deposited CHF 55 and received the 200% non-sticky bonus immediately after making the deposit. The bonus was activated automatically, and I was never given the option to activate it later.
My understanding of a non-sticky bonus is that I should be able to play with my own deposited funds first. Any winnings generated while playing with my real money should remain withdrawable, regardless of whether I have completed the bonus wagering requirements, as long as I have not yet started using the bonus balance.
This understanding is also supported by your Terms and Conditions, which state that the real money balance is used before the bonus balance. Since I had not even reached the bonus funds, all of my winnings were generated exclusively from my deposited money.
I requested a withdrawal of CHF 459, but it was rejected because I had not completed the bonus wagering requirements. This does not make sense in the context of a non-sticky bonus.
Furthermore, if the bonus is activated automatically immediately after the deposit, it is impossible for the player to avoid having an active bonus while playing with their own money. If players had the option to activate the bonus later, then this rule would make sense, because they could first finish playing with their real balance before choosing to activate the bonus. However, since the bonus is activated instantly and automatically, the player has no control over this.
I have played at many other partner casinos that offer the exact same type of non-sticky bonus. In every single case, I was able to withdraw winnings made from my real money without completing the bonus wagering requirements, provided I had not yet started using the bonus funds. This is standard behavior for a non-sticky bonus and is exactly why I chose to play under this promotion.
For these reasons, I kindly ask you to review my case again and reconsider your decision. Rejecting my withdrawal under these circumstances contradicts both the expected functionality of a non-sticky bonus and the rule that real money is used before bonus funds.
I appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
Kind regards,
Guten Tag
Hier wäre sonst noch die Mail die ich an das Support Team geschrieben habe. Leider habe ich diesbezüglich auch keine Antwort erhalten.
Dear Support Team,
I would like to request a review of my withdrawal, as I believe there has been a misunderstanding regarding the application of the 200% non-sticky bonus.
I deposited CHF 55 and received the 200% non-sticky bonus immediately after making the deposit. The bonus was activated automatically, and I was never given the option to activate it later.
My understanding of a non-sticky bonus is that I should be able to play with my own deposited funds first. Any winnings generated while playing with my real money should remain withdrawable, regardless of whether I have completed the bonus wagering requirements, as long as I have not yet started using the bonus balance.
This understanding is also supported by your Terms and Conditions, which state that the real money balance is used before the bonus balance. Since I had not even reached the bonus funds, all of my winnings were generated exclusively from my deposited money.
I requested a withdrawal of CHF 459, but it was rejected because I had not completed the bonus wagering requirements. This does not make sense in the context of a non-sticky bonus.
Furthermore, if the bonus is activated automatically immediately after the deposit, it is impossible for the player to avoid having an active bonus while playing with their own money. If players had the option to activate the bonus later, then this rule would make sense, because they could first finish playing with their real balance before choosing to activate the bonus. However, since the bonus is activated instantly and automatically, the player has no control over this.
I have played at many other partner casinos that offer the exact same type of non-sticky bonus. In every single case, I was able to withdraw winnings made from my real money without completing the bonus wagering requirements, provided I had not yet started using the bonus funds. This is standard behavior for a non-sticky bonus and is exactly why I chose to play under this promotion.
For these reasons, I kindly ask you to review my case again and reconsider your decision. Rejecting my withdrawal under these circumstances contradicts both the expected functionality of a non-sticky bonus and the rule that real money is used before bonus funds.
I appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
Kind regards,