Dear Rakeloviedo,
It appears that both parties have now presented all of the information and evidence available. After carefully reviewing the complaint, the correspondence, and the documentation provided by both you and the casino, we have reached our final conclusion.
We acknowledge that the casino's responsible gambling process may not have been as clear or intuitive as it could have been. Since the self-exclusion option redirected players to the live chat, it is understandable that you believed informing the support agent about your gambling problem would be sufficient to initiate a permanent self-exclusion.
However, the casino's Responsible Gambling Policy explicitly states that permanent self-exclusion requests due to gambling addiction must be submitted via email to the designated support address. While you maintain that you had previously informed the casino about your gambling problem through live chat, we have not received sufficient evidence demonstrating that the casino accepted or processed a responsible gambling request before your email of June 27.
The emails submitted prior to June 27 requested account closure but did not explicitly mention gambling addiction. As a result, the casino treated them as standard account closure requests, which can generally be reversed at the player's request. Based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to honor a valid self-exclusion request made in accordance with its established procedure before June 27.
Regarding your request for a refund of losses, refunds in responsible gambling cases are generally only considered when there is clear evidence that the casino failed to act after receiving a valid gambling addiction disclosure or failed to comply with its responsible gambling obligations. Based on the evidence available to us, we cannot establish that such a failure occurred.
For these reasons, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or that there are sufficient grounds to recommend a refund of your losses. Consequently, this complaint will be closed as rejected.
We appreciate the time and effort you invested in presenting your case. We also sincerely encourage you to continue seeking support for your gambling addiction. Protecting your wellbeing is far more important than any individual gambling dispute, and we hope you are able to access the assistance you need.
Best regards,
Jean
Dear Rakeloviedo,
It appears that both parties have now presented all of the information and evidence available. After carefully reviewing the complaint, the correspondence, and the documentation provided by both you and the casino, we have reached our final conclusion.
We acknowledge that the casino's responsible gambling process may not have been as clear or intuitive as it could have been. Since the self-exclusion option redirected players to the live chat, it is understandable that you believed informing the support agent about your gambling problem would be sufficient to initiate a permanent self-exclusion.
However, the casino's Responsible Gambling Policy explicitly states that permanent self-exclusion requests due to gambling addiction must be submitted via email to the designated support address. While you maintain that you had previously informed the casino about your gambling problem through live chat, we have not received sufficient evidence demonstrating that the casino accepted or processed a responsible gambling request before your email of June 27.
The emails submitted prior to June 27 requested account closure but did not explicitly mention gambling addiction. As a result, the casino treated them as standard account closure requests, which can generally be reversed at the player's request. Based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to honor a valid self-exclusion request made in accordance with its established procedure before June 27.
Regarding your request for a refund of losses, refunds in responsible gambling cases are generally only considered when there is clear evidence that the casino failed to act after receiving a valid gambling addiction disclosure or failed to comply with its responsible gambling obligations. Based on the evidence available to us, we cannot establish that such a failure occurred.
For these reasons, we are unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or that there are sufficient grounds to recommend a refund of your losses. Consequently, this complaint will be closed as rejected.
We appreciate the time and effort you invested in presenting your case. We also sincerely encourage you to continue seeking support for your gambling addiction. Protecting your wellbeing is far more important than any individual gambling dispute, and we hope you are able to access the assistance you need.
Best regards,
Jean