Hi TheKiron,
Thank you for your cooperation.
Unfortunately, we won't be able to proceed further with this complaint. After careful consideration and reviewing all available information, we believe the casino accused you of using multiple accounts because two accounts were accessed from one device. From a compliance perspective, this directly falls under the rule prohibiting sharing an account or granting access to third parties.
In practice, one device should mean one user. Logins are remembered, sessions are stored, and devices create persistent digital identifiers. Once two accounts are accessed from the same device, the casino cannot distinguish whether the second person simply logged in independently or was granted access by the original account holder.
And this is exactly the issue: it becomes technically impossible for a player to prove that access was not granted to a third party once the same device is used.
Casinos do not need to prove collaboration beyond that technical link. The shared device itself creates a justified compliance concern under their anti-abuse and risk management rules.
I fully understand that from your personal perspective you see two separate individuals. However, from a regulatory and fraud-prevention standpoint, the casino’s position is considered justified once that device link exists.
For this reason, and after reviewing everything carefully, we are not in a position to challenge the casino’s decision further, and we must close this complaint.
I am truly sorry that this is not the outcome you were hoping for.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Casino.Guru
Hi TheKiron,
Thank you for your cooperation.
Unfortunately, we won't be able to proceed further with this complaint. After careful consideration and reviewing all available information, we believe the casino accused you of using multiple accounts because two accounts were accessed from one device. From a compliance perspective, this directly falls under the rule prohibiting sharing an account or granting access to third parties.
In practice, one device should mean one user. Logins are remembered, sessions are stored, and devices create persistent digital identifiers. Once two accounts are accessed from the same device, the casino cannot distinguish whether the second person simply logged in independently or was granted access by the original account holder.
And this is exactly the issue: it becomes technically impossible for a player to prove that access was not granted to a third party once the same device is used.
Casinos do not need to prove collaboration beyond that technical link. The shared device itself creates a justified compliance concern under their anti-abuse and risk management rules.
I fully understand that from your personal perspective you see two separate individuals. However, from a regulatory and fraud-prevention standpoint, the casino’s position is considered justified once that device link exists.
For this reason, and after reviewing everything carefully, we are not in a position to challenge the casino’s decision further, and we must close this complaint.
I am truly sorry that this is not the outcome you were hoping for.
Kind regards,
Kristina
Casino.Guru