Dear Jacko138,
Thank you for your detailed response. I understand that this situation has had a very serious impact on you, and I'm genuinely sorry to hear about the distress you experienced. We do not take allegations concerning gambling harm or the treatment of vulnerable players lightly.
At the same time, we would like to clarify our position. We take every complaint seriously and assess each case objectively and based on the available evidence. In complaints involving self-exclusion or a failure to protect a vulnerable player, it is particularly important for us to establish that the casino was explicitly informed about the player's gambling problem and nevertheless failed to take appropriate action. Without evidence confirming this, we cannot conclude that the casino was aware of the player's vulnerability at the relevant time.
We understand your point that the communication took place through Funbet's own live-chat system and that the casino may therefore have records of it. However, we cannot simply assume that such records are still available. Casinos may have different data-retention policies, and they may legitimately inform us that historical live-chat records are no longer available. For this reason, players should retain important communications relating to account closure, particularly where the reason for the request is relevant to a potential future complaint.
We also checked the information Funbet provides in its Responsible Gambling section. According to the casino's stated procedure, self-exclusion requests must be submitted by email. This is relevant because live-chat agents may not have access to all account-management or responsible-gambling features and may therefore be unable to process a self-exclusion request in the same way as the relevant department. For this reason, when a player wants to self-exclude due to gambling problems, it is important to use the designated communication channel and clearly state the reason for the request.
We therefore have to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to establish a failure on Funbet's part in this particular case. For these reasons, we are rejecting your complaint.
We appreciate that this is not the outcome you were hoping for, and we are sorry that we cannot provide a different resolution based on the evidence currently available.
Best regards
Veronika
Casino.Guru
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear Jacko138,
Thank you for your detailed response. I understand that this situation has had a very serious impact on you, and I'm genuinely sorry to hear about the distress you experienced. We do not take allegations concerning gambling harm or the treatment of vulnerable players lightly.
At the same time, we would like to clarify our position. We take every complaint seriously and assess each case objectively and based on the available evidence. In complaints involving self-exclusion or a failure to protect a vulnerable player, it is particularly important for us to establish that the casino was explicitly informed about the player's gambling problem and nevertheless failed to take appropriate action. Without evidence confirming this, we cannot conclude that the casino was aware of the player's vulnerability at the relevant time.
We understand your point that the communication took place through Funbet's own live-chat system and that the casino may therefore have records of it. However, we cannot simply assume that such records are still available. Casinos may have different data-retention policies, and they may legitimately inform us that historical live-chat records are no longer available. For this reason, players should retain important communications relating to account closure, particularly where the reason for the request is relevant to a potential future complaint.
We also checked the information Funbet provides in its Responsible Gambling section. According to the casino's stated procedure, self-exclusion requests must be submitted by email. This is relevant because live-chat agents may not have access to all account-management or responsible-gambling features and may therefore be unable to process a self-exclusion request in the same way as the relevant department. For this reason, when a player wants to self-exclude due to gambling problems, it is important to use the designated communication channel and clearly state the reason for the request.
We therefore have to conclude that there is insufficient evidence to establish a failure on Funbet's part in this particular case. For these reasons, we are rejecting your complaint.
We appreciate that this is not the outcome you were hoping for, and we are sorry that we cannot provide a different resolution based on the evidence currently available.
Best regards
Veronika
Casino.Guru
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
