Dear DirectionBet Casino,
Thank you for your response.
We fully understand the necessity of allowing technical time for the manual processing of self-exclusion requests, and we support casinos in cases where such actions are taken within a reasonable timeframe. However, in this particular instance, the closure of the player’s account took three weeks, which, from our perspective, falls well outside what can be considered reasonable.
When a casino acknowledges that a player has a gambling problem, it is crucial to take immediate and effective action to prevent further gambling-related harm - including preventing additional deposits or use of existing funds. Once the casino is aware of the player’s gambling issues, it assumes responsibility for safeguarding that player from further harm.
In this case, the player explicitly stated his gambling problem and requested account closure in his self-exclusion request dated August 12. Despite this, the account remained open, allowing continued play.
For these reasons, we believe the player should be eligible for a refund of losses incurred during the period in which the casino was aware of the player’s gambling problem but failed to take prompt and appropriate action.
I kindly ask that you provide the player’s full gaming history from August 12 until the date of account closure. Please send the requested file in CSV, XLSX, or another convenient format to my email address at jakub.m@casino.guru.
Thank you for your cooperation and timely attention to this matter.
Dear DirectionBet Casino,
Thank you for your response.
We fully understand the necessity of allowing technical time for the manual processing of self-exclusion requests, and we support casinos in cases where such actions are taken within a reasonable timeframe. However, in this particular instance, the closure of the player’s account took three weeks, which, from our perspective, falls well outside what can be considered reasonable.
When a casino acknowledges that a player has a gambling problem, it is crucial to take immediate and effective action to prevent further gambling-related harm - including preventing additional deposits or use of existing funds. Once the casino is aware of the player’s gambling issues, it assumes responsibility for safeguarding that player from further harm.
In this case, the player explicitly stated his gambling problem and requested account closure in his self-exclusion request dated August 12. Despite this, the account remained open, allowing continued play.
For these reasons, we believe the player should be eligible for a refund of losses incurred during the period in which the casino was aware of the player’s gambling problem but failed to take prompt and appropriate action.
I kindly ask that you provide the player’s full gaming history from August 12 until the date of account closure. Please send the requested file in CSV, XLSX, or another convenient format to my email address at jakub.m@casino.guru.
Thank you for your cooperation and timely attention to this matter.