Hello,
I would like to clarify the latest response I received from the casino, as it introduces a new interpretation of their bonus terms.
The casino is now stating that bonus restrictions, including the maximum bet rule, do not apply only during the wagering phase, but continue to apply even after wagering is completed, until the bonus is considered fully "completed, converted, and settled."
According to their explanation, even though the wagering requirements were completed and my balance was reduced to 500€ (as per the maximum conversion rule), they still consider the bonus conditions to be active beyond that point.
Based on this reasoning, they claim that some of my bets (which were placed after the wagering was completed) are still subject to the maximum bet restriction.
However, I find this interpretation unclear and potentially contradictory, because:
- The balance had already been reduced to 500€, which indicates that the bonus had already been converted
- At that stage, the remaining funds should logically be considered real money
- I have not found a clear clause in the Terms and Conditions stating that maximum bet restrictions continue to apply after wagering is completed
For this reason, I believe this interpretation is not sufficiently transparent and may not be fairly applied.
I would appreciate your help in reviewing whether this interpretation of the bonus terms is valid and clearly supported by the casino’s Terms and Conditions.
I would also like to add an important point regarding the consequences of a potential maximum bet violation.
Even in the scenario where such a violation occurred during the bonus phase, I believe that the complete confiscation of all winnings is a disproportionate outcome.
Based on my experience across multiple online casinos, exceeding the maximum bet limit typically results in the specific bets not counting toward wagering requirements, rather than the full removal of all winnings.
In this case, there was no clear and prominent indication that a single instance of exceeding the bet limit could lead to the total confiscation of funds.
For this reason, I believe that the applied measure is not only unclear but also excessively severe compared to standard industry practice.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Hello,
I would like to clarify the latest response I received from the casino, as it introduces a new interpretation of their bonus terms.
The casino is now stating that bonus restrictions, including the maximum bet rule, do not apply only during the wagering phase, but continue to apply even after wagering is completed, until the bonus is considered fully "completed, converted, and settled."
According to their explanation, even though the wagering requirements were completed and my balance was reduced to 500€ (as per the maximum conversion rule), they still consider the bonus conditions to be active beyond that point.
Based on this reasoning, they claim that some of my bets (which were placed after the wagering was completed) are still subject to the maximum bet restriction.
However, I find this interpretation unclear and potentially contradictory, because:
- The balance had already been reduced to 500€, which indicates that the bonus had already been converted
- At that stage, the remaining funds should logically be considered real money
- I have not found a clear clause in the Terms and Conditions stating that maximum bet restrictions continue to apply after wagering is completed
For this reason, I believe this interpretation is not sufficiently transparent and may not be fairly applied.
I would appreciate your help in reviewing whether this interpretation of the bonus terms is valid and clearly supported by the casino’s Terms and Conditions.
I would also like to add an important point regarding the consequences of a potential maximum bet violation.
Even in the scenario where such a violation occurred during the bonus phase, I believe that the complete confiscation of all winnings is a disproportionate outcome.
Based on my experience across multiple online casinos, exceeding the maximum bet limit typically results in the specific bets not counting toward wagering requirements, rather than the full removal of all winnings.
In this case, there was no clear and prominent indication that a single instance of exceeding the bet limit could lead to the total confiscation of funds.
For this reason, I believe that the applied measure is not only unclear but also excessively severe compared to standard industry practice.
Thank you very much for your assistance.