Hi
You have confirmed that your Terms of Service do not require any specific subject line for self-exclusion requests. Therefore, the responsibility for processing such requests promptly should not depend on an internal rule that is not formally documented.
While I understand that automated systems help manage queues, it is ultimately the company’s responsibility to ensure that critical requests—such as self-exclusion—are identified and prioritized regardless of the email thread or subject line. Me as a customer should not bear the consequences of internal routing issues.
My request was sent to your official support email address, as instructed. This fulfills my obligation as a customer. How emails are processed internally is beyond my control and should not delay the execution of an important action like account locking.
If specific wording in the subject line is essential for prioritization, this must be clearly stated in your official guidelines or Terms of Service—not only communicated informally by support teams. Without such documentation, customers cannot reasonably be expected to comply.
I find it quite shocking that a company operating in the gambling industry does not provide clear and accessible information on its website about what a player should do if they are experiencing gambling addiction or wish to self-exclude. This is not only surprising—it raises serious concerns about your commitment to responsible gambling practices.
As a licensed operator, it is expected that you prioritize player protection and make self-exclusion procedures and support resources highly visible and easy to access. The absence of such information on your official channels is unacceptable and contradicts widely recognized standards for responsible gaming.
Hi
You have confirmed that your Terms of Service do not require any specific subject line for self-exclusion requests. Therefore, the responsibility for processing such requests promptly should not depend on an internal rule that is not formally documented.
While I understand that automated systems help manage queues, it is ultimately the company’s responsibility to ensure that critical requests—such as self-exclusion—are identified and prioritized regardless of the email thread or subject line. Me as a customer should not bear the consequences of internal routing issues.
My request was sent to your official support email address, as instructed. This fulfills my obligation as a customer. How emails are processed internally is beyond my control and should not delay the execution of an important action like account locking.
If specific wording in the subject line is essential for prioritization, this must be clearly stated in your official guidelines or Terms of Service—not only communicated informally by support teams. Without such documentation, customers cannot reasonably be expected to comply.
I find it quite shocking that a company operating in the gambling industry does not provide clear and accessible information on its website about what a player should do if they are experiencing gambling addiction or wish to self-exclude. This is not only surprising—it raises serious concerns about your commitment to responsible gambling practices.
As a licensed operator, it is expected that you prioritize player protection and make self-exclusion procedures and support resources highly visible and easy to access. The absence of such information on your official channels is unacceptable and contradicts widely recognized standards for responsible gaming.