Dear Adam,
Thank you once again for your continued engagement and for sharing the Casino Guru Fair Gambling Codex position.
We fully understand your concerns and the importance of maintaining fair practices across the industry. At the same time, we must respectfully stand by our current resolution, which is grounded in both our Terms and Conditions and the applicable regulatory obligations under the Anjouan license.
As previously stated, the player’s country of residence was only confirmed during the withdrawal process, in line with Anjouan’s Customer Due Diligence (CDD) requirements, which mandate identity and location verification at the first withdrawal. Once the player submitted proof of address confirming residence in Germany — a restricted jurisdiction — we acted immediately in accordance with:
Clause 5.1.3: prohibiting use of our Services from restricted countries;
Clause 5.6: stating that all transactions from such jurisdictions will be nullified and only the deposit amount returned.
As a licensed operator, we are legally obligated to enforce these rules. The player violated the Terms and Conditions, and accordingly, we applied the relevant policy — returning the full deposit of 102.99 USD and voiding the winnings, as stipulated in our rules.
It’s also important to emphasize that before completing registration, the player was required to manually confirm agreement with our Terms and Conditions by checking the appropriate box — which serves as active user consent. This confirmation implies that the player has read, understood, and accepted the terms, including jurisdictional restrictions and the consequences of violating them. In other words, the player was fully aware of the rules and the potential outcome in such cases.
We strongly believe that this case is not about fairness, but rather about attempting to profit from a knowingly made violation. The player was able to register, deposit, and play from a restricted country — in direct breach of our terms — and only raised the issue once winnings were involved. This raises serious doubts about the good faith intentions behind the complaint.
Moreover, offering payouts in such cases would create a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging other users to deliberately bypass restrictions with the expectation of leniency or financial gain. This would not only undermine the integrity of our platform, but also weaken adherence to both contractual and regulatory standards.
We appreciate your recommendations regarding preventive measures and are currently reviewing options to strengthen registration-level restrictions. However, we believe our handling of this case was fair, legally justified, and aligned with both licensing obligations and industry compliance standards. The player did not suffer any financial loss — the full deposit was returned — and the outcome followed clearly defined terms.
Kind regards,
Claps Casino Team
Dear Adam,
Thank you once again for your continued engagement and for sharing the Casino Guru Fair Gambling Codex position.
We fully understand your concerns and the importance of maintaining fair practices across the industry. At the same time, we must respectfully stand by our current resolution, which is grounded in both our Terms and Conditions and the applicable regulatory obligations under the Anjouan license.
As previously stated, the player’s country of residence was only confirmed during the withdrawal process, in line with Anjouan’s Customer Due Diligence (CDD) requirements, which mandate identity and location verification at the first withdrawal. Once the player submitted proof of address confirming residence in Germany — a restricted jurisdiction — we acted immediately in accordance with:
Clause 5.1.3: prohibiting use of our Services from restricted countries;
Clause 5.6: stating that all transactions from such jurisdictions will be nullified and only the deposit amount returned.
As a licensed operator, we are legally obligated to enforce these rules. The player violated the Terms and Conditions, and accordingly, we applied the relevant policy — returning the full deposit of 102.99 USD and voiding the winnings, as stipulated in our rules.
It’s also important to emphasize that before completing registration, the player was required to manually confirm agreement with our Terms and Conditions by checking the appropriate box — which serves as active user consent. This confirmation implies that the player has read, understood, and accepted the terms, including jurisdictional restrictions and the consequences of violating them. In other words, the player was fully aware of the rules and the potential outcome in such cases.
We strongly believe that this case is not about fairness, but rather about attempting to profit from a knowingly made violation. The player was able to register, deposit, and play from a restricted country — in direct breach of our terms — and only raised the issue once winnings were involved. This raises serious doubts about the good faith intentions behind the complaint.
Moreover, offering payouts in such cases would create a dangerous precedent, potentially encouraging other users to deliberately bypass restrictions with the expectation of leniency or financial gain. This would not only undermine the integrity of our platform, but also weaken adherence to both contractual and regulatory standards.
We appreciate your recommendations regarding preventive measures and are currently reviewing options to strengthen registration-level restrictions. However, we believe our handling of this case was fair, legally justified, and aligned with both licensing obligations and industry compliance standards. The player did not suffer any financial loss — the full deposit was returned — and the outcome followed clearly defined terms.
Kind regards,
Claps Casino Team