Dear Franciscojesusrod,
Thank you for your message and for providing the latest communication from the casino.
After carefully reviewing all the information available, we must conclude that you first informed the casino about your gambling addiction and requested self-exclusion only after you had already lost your deposits. Additionally, despite being asked multiple times, you have not provided evidence showing that you informed the casino about your gambling problem before the losses occurred.
Based on the timeline and the communications provided, we do not have sufficient grounds to claim that the casino failed to protect you prior to your losses. For this reason, we are unable to pursue the refund request further and must reject this complaint.
Best regards,
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear Franciscojesusrod,
Thank you for your message and for providing the latest communication from the casino.
After carefully reviewing all the information available, we must conclude that you first informed the casino about your gambling addiction and requested self-exclusion only after you had already lost your deposits. Additionally, despite being asked multiple times, you have not provided evidence showing that you informed the casino about your gambling problem before the losses occurred.
Based on the timeline and the communications provided, we do not have sufficient grounds to claim that the casino failed to protect you prior to your losses. For this reason, we are unable to pursue the refund request further and must reject this complaint.
Best regards,
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
