We have carefully reviewed the complaint regarding the alleged deposit of 28 BTC and the subsequent account suspension. After thorough investigation, we provide the following official clarification.
The account in question was registered on 13 July 2025.
The first activity and deposit attempts were recorded on the same day.
The account was suspended on 14 July 2025 (please note: unlike User mentioned on 29 July), immediately after our Security Team detected a breach connected to a payment provider vulnerability.
Some facts to be highlighted:
1. No actual transfer of 28 BTC ever occurred
The user made a real deposit of 28 USDT but exploited a technical vulnerability of the payment provider, which caused the system to incorrectly display 28 BTC on the account balance.
2. No proof of the alleged 28 BTC transaction was provided
In cryptocurrency operations, every transaction can be verified by a blockchain hash. Despite multiple requests, the user has never submitted a hash or any confirmation of such a transaction. This clearly indicates that no 28 BTC transfer was made.
3. Contradictions in the user’s statements
In the complaint, the user first claims to have deposited 28 BTC and later refers to 30 BTC. A person who actually transferred such a large sum (approximately 3,350,000 USD) would never be uncertain about the exact amount.
4. Verification was never completed or even started
Although the user claims to have passed verification, no documents were ever uploaded to the account.
5. Suspicious deposit behavior
The user made multiple consecutive deposit attempts with different amounts and very short time intervals between them — a clear pattern consistent with intentional testing of a technical vulnerability.
The timeline of actions on 13 July 2025 (UTC) is as follows:
07:02:01 – deposit attempt of 1 BTC
07:02:18 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC (17 seconds later)
07:02:34 – deposit attempt of 20 BTC (16 seconds later)
07:03:04 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC (30 seconds later)
07:08:10 – deposit attempt of 76 TRX (5 minutes later)
07:08:44 – deposit attempt of 14 TRX (34 seconds later)
07:09:30 – deposit attempt of 15 BTC
07:04:09 – real deposit of 0.00213 BTC (the only confirmed transaction on blockchain)
07:04:10 – deposit attempt of 13 BTC (1 second after the real transaction)
07:10:20 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC
07:11:55 – deposit attempt of 31 BTC
07:12:40 – deposit attempt of 28 BTC
07:13:10 – deposit attempt of 20 BTC
07:14:05 – deposit attempt of 30 BTC
07:15:30 – deposit attempt of 25 BTC
In total, 25 deposit attempts were made within a very short period of time, with various sums and currencies (BTC, TRX). Only one small deposit was valid and confirmed (0.00213 BTC). The 28 BTC shown in the account was the result of exploiting the payment system vulnerability, not a real transaction.
6. Gameplay before suspension
The user’s statement that the account was suspended immediately is false. Before the suspension, the user actively played several games, including Hand of Anubis, Loki Loot, and Royal Shooter, and spent 0.0973 BTC (approximately 11,000 USD) from the fraudulent balance.
The user intentionally manipulated a technical vulnerability of the payment provider to artificially increase the balance from 28 USDT to 28 BTC, without making any real deposit.
In communication with our support manager, this user stated that there was no transfer of 28 BTC, and that 28 USDT was withdrawn instead. The transcript of the conversation is attached and will be sent to the forum manager - Matej. This confirms that the user manipulated the system and was aware of doing so.
The suspension was applied strictly in accordance with our Terms of Service and anti-fraud policy to prevent further losses. The platform has already suffered financial damage as a result of these fraudulent actions.
We respectfully request the dismissal of this complaint as fraudulent and manipulative.
The user’s statements contain multiple contradictions, and there is no evidence of any legitimate transfer.
We urge other operators and community members to be cautious of similar fraudulent patterns.
We have carefully reviewed the complaint regarding the alleged deposit of 28 BTC and the subsequent account suspension. After thorough investigation, we provide the following official clarification.
The account in question was registered on 13 July 2025.
The first activity and deposit attempts were recorded on the same day.
The account was suspended on 14 July 2025 (please note: unlike User mentioned on 29 July), immediately after our Security Team detected a breach connected to a payment provider vulnerability.
Some facts to be highlighted:
1. No actual transfer of 28 BTC ever occurred
The user made a real deposit of 28 USDT but exploited a technical vulnerability of the payment provider, which caused the system to incorrectly display 28 BTC on the account balance.
2. No proof of the alleged 28 BTC transaction was provided
In cryptocurrency operations, every transaction can be verified by a blockchain hash. Despite multiple requests, the user has never submitted a hash or any confirmation of such a transaction. This clearly indicates that no 28 BTC transfer was made.
3. Contradictions in the user’s statements
In the complaint, the user first claims to have deposited 28 BTC and later refers to 30 BTC. A person who actually transferred such a large sum (approximately 3,350,000 USD) would never be uncertain about the exact amount.
4. Verification was never completed or even started
Although the user claims to have passed verification, no documents were ever uploaded to the account.
5. Suspicious deposit behavior
The user made multiple consecutive deposit attempts with different amounts and very short time intervals between them — a clear pattern consistent with intentional testing of a technical vulnerability.
The timeline of actions on 13 July 2025 (UTC) is as follows:
07:02:01 – deposit attempt of 1 BTC
07:02:18 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC (17 seconds later)
07:02:34 – deposit attempt of 20 BTC (16 seconds later)
07:03:04 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC (30 seconds later)
07:08:10 – deposit attempt of 76 TRX (5 minutes later)
07:08:44 – deposit attempt of 14 TRX (34 seconds later)
07:09:30 – deposit attempt of 15 BTC
07:04:09 – real deposit of 0.00213 BTC (the only confirmed transaction on blockchain)
07:04:10 – deposit attempt of 13 BTC (1 second after the real transaction)
07:10:20 – deposit attempt of 10 BTC
07:11:55 – deposit attempt of 31 BTC
07:12:40 – deposit attempt of 28 BTC
07:13:10 – deposit attempt of 20 BTC
07:14:05 – deposit attempt of 30 BTC
07:15:30 – deposit attempt of 25 BTC
In total, 25 deposit attempts were made within a very short period of time, with various sums and currencies (BTC, TRX). Only one small deposit was valid and confirmed (0.00213 BTC). The 28 BTC shown in the account was the result of exploiting the payment system vulnerability, not a real transaction.
6. Gameplay before suspension
The user’s statement that the account was suspended immediately is false. Before the suspension, the user actively played several games, including Hand of Anubis, Loki Loot, and Royal Shooter, and spent 0.0973 BTC (approximately 11,000 USD) from the fraudulent balance.
The user intentionally manipulated a technical vulnerability of the payment provider to artificially increase the balance from 28 USDT to 28 BTC, without making any real deposit.
In communication with our support manager, this user stated that there was no transfer of 28 BTC, and that 28 USDT was withdrawn instead. The transcript of the conversation is attached and will be sent to the forum manager - Matej. This confirms that the user manipulated the system and was aware of doing so.
The suspension was applied strictly in accordance with our Terms of Service and anti-fraud policy to prevent further losses. The platform has already suffered financial damage as a result of these fraudulent actions.
We respectfully request the dismissal of this complaint as fraudulent and manipulative.
The user’s statements contain multiple contradictions, and there is no evidence of any legitimate transfer.
We urge other operators and community members to be cautious of similar fraudulent patterns.