Thank you all for your responses.
This is certainly a bit of a nuanced case, and I would like to share my observations from a neutral, independent mediator’s perspective.
On the one hand, it is understandable that each casino applies its own KYC procedures, which may differ from those of other operators. Consequently, outcomes are not always consistent, even when similar or additional documentation is provided. In this instance, Sumsub—a widely recognised KYC provider within the industry—identified the submitted proof of address bill as an edited or template-based document. From a strict procedural standpoint, the casino is therefore within its rights to act in accordance with its established policies once such a determination is made.
On the other hand, it is also worth noting that the player demonstrated a willingness to cooperate further by offering to submit alternative proof of address and by agreeing to have the questioned electricity bill reviewed or annotated accordingly. A more open and continued dialogue throughout the KYC process could have contributed to a clearer and more transparent resolution, in line with the standards of fairness and good practice generally expected within the industry.
Dear mattysword,
To help provide some additional clarity and perhaps a potential resolution, I kindly ask that you obtain your electricity bill in an official PDF format directly from Enovous. The version you previously submitted was provided as an image rather than a PDF; this could be one of the factors why it was flagged by Sumsub. PDFs are generally considered a more reliable and verifiable format.
Obtaining the bill in PDF form should be straightforward and can typically be done either by requesting it via email or by downloading it directly from your online customer account. Please ensure that the PDF is in its original, unedited format and has not been altered in any way. Please send me the bill to my email, michal.k@casino.guru.
Thank you all for your responses.
This is certainly a bit of a nuanced case, and I would like to share my observations from a neutral, independent mediator’s perspective.
On the one hand, it is understandable that each casino applies its own KYC procedures, which may differ from those of other operators. Consequently, outcomes are not always consistent, even when similar or additional documentation is provided. In this instance, Sumsub—a widely recognised KYC provider within the industry—identified the submitted proof of address bill as an edited or template-based document. From a strict procedural standpoint, the casino is therefore within its rights to act in accordance with its established policies once such a determination is made.
On the other hand, it is also worth noting that the player demonstrated a willingness to cooperate further by offering to submit alternative proof of address and by agreeing to have the questioned electricity bill reviewed or annotated accordingly. A more open and continued dialogue throughout the KYC process could have contributed to a clearer and more transparent resolution, in line with the standards of fairness and good practice generally expected within the industry.
Dear mattysword,
To help provide some additional clarity and perhaps a potential resolution, I kindly ask that you obtain your electricity bill in an official PDF format directly from Enovous. The version you previously submitted was provided as an image rather than a PDF; this could be one of the factors why it was flagged by Sumsub. PDFs are generally considered a more reliable and verifiable format.
Obtaining the bill in PDF form should be straightforward and can typically be done either by requesting it via email or by downloading it directly from your online customer account. Please ensure that the PDF is in its original, unedited format and has not been altered in any way. Please send me the bill to my email, michal.k@casino.guru.