On 18 July 2026, I opened an account at CasinoExtreme.eu. Before making any deposit, I was unsure whether I might already have had an account with the casino from the past, so I contacted live chat specifically to ask them to check whether another account existed under my details.
To make the check as accurate as possible, I provided the live chat agent with my full name, including my middle name. This is important because when I registered the new account, I had used only my first and last name, without my middle name.
The live chat agent's response consisted of two parts. First, the agent stated that, based on a preliminary check, there were no indications that I had another account with the casino. The screenshot of this conversation is attached to my complaint. The agent then added a disclaimer explaining that only the Documents/Banking Department could provide the final confirmation regarding account status.
I understood and accepted that disclaimer. However, I also reasonably relied on the agent's actual preliminary finding that no duplicate account had been identified. I had deliberately given the agent my full three-part name precisely so that any previous account under my identity could be detected.
Based on this information, I proceeded to make a deposit and play.
It later turned out that I did in fact have an older account, and CasinoExtreme refused to pay my winnings because of the multiple-account rule.
The casino subsequently explained that live chat does not have the ability to identify every duplicate account, particularly in more complicated situations. They stated that the older account was more difficult to identify because it had been registered without an address and under my full three-part name.
However, this explanation is exactly why I believe my complaint deserves consideration. I specifically provided the live chat agent with all three of my names and my date of birth before depositing. Therefore, the difference in how my name appeared on the newer account should not have prevented the agent from identifying the older account when I had voluntarily supplied the missing middle name during the chat.
I fully understand that the agent included a disclaimer that the Documents Department had the final authority. I am not disputing that. My concern is that the casino also gave me a positive preliminary answer stating that no multiple account had been found.
If the live chat had simply told me, "We cannot check this, and you must wait for the Documents Department before depositing," I would have understood that I was proceeding entirely at my own risk. But that was not the answer I received. I was specifically told that a preliminary check had found no other account.
There was no intention on my part to abuse the casino's bonus system or deliberately create a second account. In fact, my decision to contact support before depositing demonstrates the opposite: I was actively trying to avoid violating the multiple-account rule.
I therefore do not believe it is fair for the casino to place 100% of the responsibility on me while accepting no responsibility for the incorrect preliminary information provided by its own support representative.
I am also not demanding payment of the full disputed winnings. I have already proposed a compromise and asked the casino to consider a reasonable partial goodwill payment that reflects the shared responsibility in this situation. The casino has refused and has only agreed to return my deposit.
I respectfully ask Casino.Guru to consider whether this is a fair outcome.
In my view, a fair resolution would be for CasinoExtreme to pay a reasonable portion of the disputed winnings as a goodwill settlement. I accept that the casino's terms prohibit multiple accounts, but I also believe that the circumstances are important: I proactively asked the casino to check before depositing, gave the agent my full name including my middle name , received a preliminary confirmation that no other account had been found, and relied on that information when deciding to deposit and play.
I am not asking Casino.Guru to ignore the casino's multiple-account rule. I am simply asking that the casino's own contribution to what happened also be taken into account and that a fair partial settlement be considered.
On 18 July 2026, I opened an account at CasinoExtreme.eu. Before making any deposit, I was unsure whether I might already have had an account with the casino from the past, so I contacted live chat specifically to ask them to check whether another account existed under my details.
To make the check as accurate as possible, I provided the live chat agent with my full name, including my middle name. This is important because when I registered the new account, I had used only my first and last name, without my middle name.
The live chat agent's response consisted of two parts. First, the agent stated that, based on a preliminary check, there were no indications that I had another account with the casino. The screenshot of this conversation is attached to my complaint. The agent then added a disclaimer explaining that only the Documents/Banking Department could provide the final confirmation regarding account status.
I understood and accepted that disclaimer. However, I also reasonably relied on the agent's actual preliminary finding that no duplicate account had been identified. I had deliberately given the agent my full three-part name precisely so that any previous account under my identity could be detected.
Based on this information, I proceeded to make a deposit and play.
It later turned out that I did in fact have an older account, and CasinoExtreme refused to pay my winnings because of the multiple-account rule.
The casino subsequently explained that live chat does not have the ability to identify every duplicate account, particularly in more complicated situations. They stated that the older account was more difficult to identify because it had been registered without an address and under my full three-part name.
However, this explanation is exactly why I believe my complaint deserves consideration. I specifically provided the live chat agent with all three of my names and my date of birth before depositing. Therefore, the difference in how my name appeared on the newer account should not have prevented the agent from identifying the older account when I had voluntarily supplied the missing middle name during the chat.
I fully understand that the agent included a disclaimer that the Documents Department had the final authority. I am not disputing that. My concern is that the casino also gave me a positive preliminary answer stating that no multiple account had been found.
If the live chat had simply told me, "We cannot check this, and you must wait for the Documents Department before depositing," I would have understood that I was proceeding entirely at my own risk. But that was not the answer I received. I was specifically told that a preliminary check had found no other account.
There was no intention on my part to abuse the casino's bonus system or deliberately create a second account. In fact, my decision to contact support before depositing demonstrates the opposite: I was actively trying to avoid violating the multiple-account rule.
I therefore do not believe it is fair for the casino to place 100% of the responsibility on me while accepting no responsibility for the incorrect preliminary information provided by its own support representative.
I am also not demanding payment of the full disputed winnings. I have already proposed a compromise and asked the casino to consider a reasonable partial goodwill payment that reflects the shared responsibility in this situation. The casino has refused and has only agreed to return my deposit.
I respectfully ask Casino.Guru to consider whether this is a fair outcome.
In my view, a fair resolution would be for CasinoExtreme to pay a reasonable portion of the disputed winnings as a goodwill settlement. I accept that the casino's terms prohibit multiple accounts, but I also believe that the circumstances are important: I proactively asked the casino to check before depositing, gave the agent my full name including my middle name , received a preliminary confirmation that no other account had been found, and relied on that information when deciding to deposit and play.
I am not asking Casino.Guru to ignore the casino's multiple-account rule. I am simply asking that the casino's own contribution to what happened also be taken into account and that a fair partial settlement be considered.