Hello Katarina,
Thank you for your reply. I am happy to clarify the information you asked for.
1. The address I provided to the casino is my actual place of residence and matches the address on my credit file.
After checking GAMSTOP, I noticed that my previous address is still listed there, but my name, date of birth, and phone number all match exactly. These are primary identifiers under GAMSTOP’s matching system, so the operator should still have identified the exclusion or carried out a manual review, especially considering my deposit pattern.
2. Yes, I contacted support after I registered and deposited.
I informed them that I have a gambling addiction and that I am already self-excluded. The account was only closed after I reached out to them. The casino did not proactively intervene.
3. I will send my GAMSTOP screenshot and any relevant self-exclusion documents to your email at katarina.d@casino.guru.
4. The last deposits were made very recently, within the past few days.
Under the UK Gambling Commission’s Social Responsibility Code Provisions (SRCP 3.4.1 and 3.5.5):
Operators must identify and interact with customers showing indicators of harm.
Operators must monitor unusually high or rapid spending, especially on new accounts.
Operators must prevent gambling by anyone with an active GAMSTOP self-exclusion.
Operators must conduct manual checks where automatic matching is incomplete or where the player shows high-risk behaviours.
In my situation:
Significant deposits were made in a very short period of time, which is a clear harm indicator requiring manual review and responsible gambling intervention.
No one from the casino contacted me, despite the pattern of deposits and the fact that I was a brand-new customer. The account was only closed when I informed them directly that I was struggling and already self-excluded.
My GAMSTOP details matched on name, date of birth, and phone number.
Even if my previous address was still listed on GAMSTOP, operators are required to carry out additional checks when several key identifiers match, particularly when there is high-risk activity.
The account should not have been able to be opened or used at all, as my GAMSTOP exclusion was active at the time.
If you need anything further, I will be happy to provide it.
Hello Katarina,
Thank you for your reply. I am happy to clarify the information you asked for.
1. The address I provided to the casino is my actual place of residence and matches the address on my credit file.
After checking GAMSTOP, I noticed that my previous address is still listed there, but my name, date of birth, and phone number all match exactly. These are primary identifiers under GAMSTOP’s matching system, so the operator should still have identified the exclusion or carried out a manual review, especially considering my deposit pattern.
2. Yes, I contacted support after I registered and deposited.
I informed them that I have a gambling addiction and that I am already self-excluded. The account was only closed after I reached out to them. The casino did not proactively intervene.
3. I will send my GAMSTOP screenshot and any relevant self-exclusion documents to your email at katarina.d@casino.guru.
4. The last deposits were made very recently, within the past few days.
Under the UK Gambling Commission’s Social Responsibility Code Provisions (SRCP 3.4.1 and 3.5.5):
Operators must identify and interact with customers showing indicators of harm.
Operators must monitor unusually high or rapid spending, especially on new accounts.
Operators must prevent gambling by anyone with an active GAMSTOP self-exclusion.
Operators must conduct manual checks where automatic matching is incomplete or where the player shows high-risk behaviours.
In my situation:
Significant deposits were made in a very short period of time, which is a clear harm indicator requiring manual review and responsible gambling intervention.
No one from the casino contacted me, despite the pattern of deposits and the fact that I was a brand-new customer. The account was only closed when I informed them directly that I was struggling and already self-excluded.
My GAMSTOP details matched on name, date of birth, and phone number.
Even if my previous address was still listed on GAMSTOP, operators are required to carry out additional checks when several key identifiers match, particularly when there is high-risk activity.
The account should not have been able to be opened or used at all, as my GAMSTOP exclusion was active at the time.
If you need anything further, I will be happy to provide it.