"Dear Attila,
I would like to provide a full clarification regarding the evidence presented:
1. The Terms Link
To be completely transparent, there was indeed a 'Terms and Conditions' link at the very bottom of the email. However, clicking this link does not take you to specific rules for this promotion. It redirects to the General Terms page which is divided into 20 different sections.
I have gone through these sections myself, and I still cannot find the specific rule stating a €30 maximum payout anywhere within that text. It is unreasonable to expect a player to search through 20 separate sections of text for a rule that isn't even clearly listed. This is not clear communication; the rule was effectively hidden rather than being presented with the offer.
2. The Screenshots Provided by the Casino
The screenshots submitted by Boomerang.bet actually support my argument.
• The bonus offer is shown in Portrait mode.
• The terms they are trying to enforce are shown in Landscape mode.
This confirms they are not from the same continuous page or view. I was never shown the 'Landscape' terms screen when I clicked 'Get Bonus'. They are separate pages, not part of the same flow.
3. Lack of Transparency & Predatory Terms
The email itself contained no mention of the €30 maximum win cap. The only way to find this was to click a link and hunt through 20 sections – and even then, the specific rule is not easily found.
Furthermore, the combination of requirements is inherently unfair:
• 200x Wagering: Requiring the player to bet €6,000.
• 1x Max Win: Limiting the payout to only €30.
Asking a player to invest that amount of playtime and risk for a maximum return equal to the original bonus amount is predatory. Such a significant restriction should have been written clearly in the email body, not buried away in a way that is almost impossible to locate.
4. System Validation
Finally, I would like to point out that the casino's own system allowed me to accumulate winnings of €1,268.
If the rule was truly that I could only win €30, the system should have capped my balance automatically while I was playing. The fact that it allowed me to reach that amount and only deducted it later confirms that these terms were not clearly integrated or applied during the game play.
I believe the winnings of €1,268 were confiscated based on terms that were not clearly or prominently disclosed at the point of acceptance.
"Dear Attila,
I would like to provide a full clarification regarding the evidence presented:
1. The Terms Link
To be completely transparent, there was indeed a 'Terms and Conditions' link at the very bottom of the email. However, clicking this link does not take you to specific rules for this promotion. It redirects to the General Terms page which is divided into 20 different sections.
I have gone through these sections myself, and I still cannot find the specific rule stating a €30 maximum payout anywhere within that text. It is unreasonable to expect a player to search through 20 separate sections of text for a rule that isn't even clearly listed. This is not clear communication; the rule was effectively hidden rather than being presented with the offer.
2. The Screenshots Provided by the Casino
The screenshots submitted by Boomerang.bet actually support my argument.
• The bonus offer is shown in Portrait mode.
• The terms they are trying to enforce are shown in Landscape mode.
This confirms they are not from the same continuous page or view. I was never shown the 'Landscape' terms screen when I clicked 'Get Bonus'. They are separate pages, not part of the same flow.
3. Lack of Transparency & Predatory Terms
The email itself contained no mention of the €30 maximum win cap. The only way to find this was to click a link and hunt through 20 sections – and even then, the specific rule is not easily found.
Furthermore, the combination of requirements is inherently unfair:
• 200x Wagering: Requiring the player to bet €6,000.
• 1x Max Win: Limiting the payout to only €30.
Asking a player to invest that amount of playtime and risk for a maximum return equal to the original bonus amount is predatory. Such a significant restriction should have been written clearly in the email body, not buried away in a way that is almost impossible to locate.
4. System Validation
Finally, I would like to point out that the casino's own system allowed me to accumulate winnings of €1,268.
If the rule was truly that I could only win €30, the system should have capped my balance automatically while I was playing. The fact that it allowed me to reach that amount and only deducted it later confirms that these terms were not clearly integrated or applied during the game play.
I believe the winnings of €1,268 were confiscated based on terms that were not clearly or prominently disclosed at the point of acceptance.