Hello everyone,
Dear BOOMERANG BET Casino Team,
Thank you for providing the additional evidence and the player's transaction history.
After reviewing the gameplay records in greater detail, I would like to address two important aspects of this case.
First, regarding the player's betting behaviour:
While I acknowledge that the player increased their stakes considerably while playing Jumper, I do not consider this sufficient evidence of deliberate exploitation.
The transaction history shows that the player also placed substantial bets in other games, including €100 bets in Sizzling Hot and bets of up to €184 in Chicken Road.
In my view, this suggests that increasing stakes was not behaviour exclusive to Jumper. It is entirely plausible that the player experienced a particularly successful gambling session, noticed that Jumper was producing favourable results, and consequently decided to increase their stakes.
This is not unusual gambling behaviour, and it does not establish that the player was aware of the underlying technical malfunction. I have not seen evidence demonstrating such awareness.
Second, and more importantly, I still have serious concerns regarding the mathematical justification for confiscating €23,550.38.
I have examined the balance-flow spreadsheet and calculated the following:
- Jumper: €236,951.00 wagered and €271,195.12 credited as winnings, resulting in a net gain of €34,244.12, or €34,444.12 when including the €200 rollback.
- Other games: €34,249.95 wagered and €23,356.20 credited as winnings, resulting in a net loss of €10,893.75.
- Remaining balance: €34,444.12 − €10,893.75 + €0.01 = €23,550.38.
I can therefore reconcile the player's final balance with the transaction history.
However, reproducing the balance is not the same as proving that the entire €23,550.38 was incorrectly credited and eligible for confiscation.
The InOut Games report confirms that a particular outcome in Jumper's HARD mode occurred more frequently than intended, resulting in an increased RTP. However, this does not automatically establish that every winning round was invalid or that all winnings generated during the affected period should be confiscated.
Furthermore, the player also participated in numerous other games, generating both wins and losses. These transactions must be properly accounted for when determining the legitimate remaining balance.
For this reason, I would appreciate a clear mathematical explanation of the adjustment:
- Which specific Jumper rounds were affected? Please identify the relevant round IDs, confirm that they were played in HARD mode during the incident period, and explain whether all such rounds were voided or only particular outcomes.
- How were the invalid winnings calculated? Please provide the total amount considered incorrectly credited, explain the methodology used to determine that amount, and clarify how the original stakes were treated.
- How was the final confiscation amount determined? Please provide a calculation showing the player's legitimate balance after correcting the affected rounds, accounting for the remaining gameplay, deposits, and withdrawals, and explain how this leads to the deduction of exactly €23,550.38.
I would particularly appreciate a calculation that can be independently reproduced from the transaction records, rather than a general conclusion that the remaining balance originated from Jumper winnings.
I understand that the casino may need to correct winnings resulting from a confirmed technical malfunction. However, any such correction must be proportionate, mathematically justified, and supported by evidence identifying the affected gameplay.
At present, the provider's report confirms that a technical issue occurred, but the evidence still does not sufficiently establish that confiscating the player's entire remaining balance was justified.
Considering how long this complaint has remained open, I would appreciate your thorough response to these remaining concerns so that I can proceed with a fair assessment.
Thank you for your continued cooperation.
Hello everyone,
Dear BOOMERANG BET Casino Team,
Thank you for providing the additional evidence and the player's transaction history.
After reviewing the gameplay records in greater detail, I would like to address two important aspects of this case.
First, regarding the player's betting behaviour:
While I acknowledge that the player increased their stakes considerably while playing Jumper, I do not consider this sufficient evidence of deliberate exploitation.
The transaction history shows that the player also placed substantial bets in other games, including €100 bets in Sizzling Hot and bets of up to €184 in Chicken Road.
In my view, this suggests that increasing stakes was not behaviour exclusive to Jumper. It is entirely plausible that the player experienced a particularly successful gambling session, noticed that Jumper was producing favourable results, and consequently decided to increase their stakes.
This is not unusual gambling behaviour, and it does not establish that the player was aware of the underlying technical malfunction. I have not seen evidence demonstrating such awareness.
Second, and more importantly, I still have serious concerns regarding the mathematical justification for confiscating €23,550.38.
I have examined the balance-flow spreadsheet and calculated the following:
- Jumper: €236,951.00 wagered and €271,195.12 credited as winnings, resulting in a net gain of €34,244.12, or €34,444.12 when including the €200 rollback.
- Other games: €34,249.95 wagered and €23,356.20 credited as winnings, resulting in a net loss of €10,893.75.
- Remaining balance: €34,444.12 − €10,893.75 + €0.01 = €23,550.38.
I can therefore reconcile the player's final balance with the transaction history.
However, reproducing the balance is not the same as proving that the entire €23,550.38 was incorrectly credited and eligible for confiscation.
The InOut Games report confirms that a particular outcome in Jumper's HARD mode occurred more frequently than intended, resulting in an increased RTP. However, this does not automatically establish that every winning round was invalid or that all winnings generated during the affected period should be confiscated.
Furthermore, the player also participated in numerous other games, generating both wins and losses. These transactions must be properly accounted for when determining the legitimate remaining balance.
For this reason, I would appreciate a clear mathematical explanation of the adjustment:
- Which specific Jumper rounds were affected? Please identify the relevant round IDs, confirm that they were played in HARD mode during the incident period, and explain whether all such rounds were voided or only particular outcomes.
- How were the invalid winnings calculated? Please provide the total amount considered incorrectly credited, explain the methodology used to determine that amount, and clarify how the original stakes were treated.
- How was the final confiscation amount determined? Please provide a calculation showing the player's legitimate balance after correcting the affected rounds, accounting for the remaining gameplay, deposits, and withdrawals, and explain how this leads to the deduction of exactly €23,550.38.
I would particularly appreciate a calculation that can be independently reproduced from the transaction records, rather than a general conclusion that the remaining balance originated from Jumper winnings.
I understand that the casino may need to correct winnings resulting from a confirmed technical malfunction. However, any such correction must be proportionate, mathematically justified, and supported by evidence identifying the affected gameplay.
At present, the provider's report confirms that a technical issue occurred, but the evidence still does not sufficiently establish that confiscating the player's entire remaining balance was justified.
Considering how long this complaint has remained open, I would appreciate your thorough response to these remaining concerns so that I can proceed with a fair assessment.
Thank you for your continued cooperation.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin