Dear Casino Guru Team,
I am submitting complete evidence regarding my dispute with Bitz Casino to request a full refund of all deposits made after an unauthorized and reckless account unblocking.
Below are the key facts and evidence proving that Bitz Casino grossly violated basic Responsible Gaming standards, lied about their system capabilities, and applied rules retrospectively.
1. Disclosure of Gambling Problems and Retention Attempts
On August 11, 2026, I explicitly stated to the official casino representative (Bitz Gift bot) that I was experiencing gambling problems ("испытываю проблемы") and needed to self-exclude. Instead of immediately enforcing a strict block, the representative attempted to discourage me from blocking my account, offering "daily bonuses" instead (Screenshot 1).
2. Direct Instruction and Deceit Regarding Technical Limitations
On the same day, I requested a 3-month block and explicitly instructed: "Please do not unblock me under any circumstances for these 3 months, even upon my own request" (Screenshot 2, 4). The representative assured me: "We have no tools for manual unlocking — the system works automatically, and we cannot bypass it" (Screenshot 3). Relying on this official statement, I trusted that my self-exclusion was absolute.
3. Instant Manual Unblocking Without a Cooling-Off Period
On August 14, 2026, just 3 days into the 3-month exclusion, the same representative manually restored my account access in just 8 minutes (from 23:58 to 00:06) upon a brief text request (Screenshot 5). The casino completely ignored my previous explicit order, bypassed any standard cooling-off period, and directly facilitated access for a self-disclosed problem gambler.
4. Retroactive Rule Application (Post-Facto Terms)
In their refusal letter, Bitz Casino claims that the unblocking was valid under their "Responsible Gaming policy" (referencing 7-day non-refundable terms and account settings). However, the "Responsible Gaming" section did not even exist on the Bitz website at the time of these events. These terms were added retrospectively after the dispute arose to cover up staff misconduct.
Summary & Financial Claim:
Bitz Casino's staff deliberately misled me regarding their ability to manually unblock accounts, actively retained a player who reported gambling issues, failed to enforce a cooling-off period, and is now trying to apply rules post-facto.
I request Casino Guru to assist in obtaining a full refund of all deposits made following the illegal unblocking on August 14, 2026, totaling 1780 USD
.
Dear Casino Guru Team,
I am submitting complete evidence regarding my dispute with Bitz Casino to request a full refund of all deposits made after an unauthorized and reckless account unblocking.
Below are the key facts and evidence proving that Bitz Casino grossly violated basic Responsible Gaming standards, lied about their system capabilities, and applied rules retrospectively.
1. Disclosure of Gambling Problems and Retention Attempts
On August 11, 2026, I explicitly stated to the official casino representative (Bitz Gift bot) that I was experiencing gambling problems ("испытываю проблемы") and needed to self-exclude. Instead of immediately enforcing a strict block, the representative attempted to discourage me from blocking my account, offering "daily bonuses" instead (Screenshot 1).
2. Direct Instruction and Deceit Regarding Technical Limitations
On the same day, I requested a 3-month block and explicitly instructed: "Please do not unblock me under any circumstances for these 3 months, even upon my own request" (Screenshot 2, 4). The representative assured me: "We have no tools for manual unlocking — the system works automatically, and we cannot bypass it" (Screenshot 3). Relying on this official statement, I trusted that my self-exclusion was absolute.
3. Instant Manual Unblocking Without a Cooling-Off Period
On August 14, 2026, just 3 days into the 3-month exclusion, the same representative manually restored my account access in just 8 minutes (from 23:58 to 00:06) upon a brief text request (Screenshot 5). The casino completely ignored my previous explicit order, bypassed any standard cooling-off period, and directly facilitated access for a self-disclosed problem gambler.
4. Retroactive Rule Application (Post-Facto Terms)
In their refusal letter, Bitz Casino claims that the unblocking was valid under their "Responsible Gaming policy" (referencing 7-day non-refundable terms and account settings). However, the "Responsible Gaming" section did not even exist on the Bitz website at the time of these events. These terms were added retrospectively after the dispute arose to cover up staff misconduct.
Summary & Financial Claim:
Bitz Casino's staff deliberately misled me regarding their ability to manually unblock accounts, actively retained a player who reported gambling issues, failed to enforce a cooling-off period, and is now trying to apply rules post-facto.
I request Casino Guru to assist in obtaining a full refund of all deposits made following the illegal unblocking on August 14, 2026, totaling 1780 USD
.