Dear Radka,
I have thoroughly reviewed the BetVibe Terms and Conditions (Section 5 and 6) as you suggested. There is NO mention of a '75% wheel coverage' rule in their written policies. A casino cannot invent a rule via a 'typo' in a chat to avoid paying a legitimate win.
I request the Casino Guru team to consider these 3 undeniable facts:
Rule of Law: If a rule is not in the written T&C, it does not exist. The casino cannot penalize a player for a rule they never published.
Approval via Payment: Under Section 4.2.3, the casino must verify gameplay before paying. BetVibe already approved and paid 5 withdrawals (₹52,500) from this same session. By doing so, they officially validated my gameplay. They cannot 'un-verify' the same session now just to save ₹48,300.
AML Misuse: The casino is now citing AML Clause 5 (Suspicious Transactions) for a game win. Winning an RNG-based game (Crazy Time) is not 'Money Laundering'. Using AML as an excuse to confiscate winnings from a 6-year-old child's ICU fund is a severe ethical violation.
I am fighting for my daughter’s life in the ICU. I beg Casino Guru to not let the casino hide behind 'typos' and non-existent rules. If they paid half, they must pay the rest."
Dear Radka,
I have thoroughly reviewed the BetVibe Terms and Conditions (Section 5 and 6) as you suggested. There is NO mention of a '75% wheel coverage' rule in their written policies. A casino cannot invent a rule via a 'typo' in a chat to avoid paying a legitimate win.
I request the Casino Guru team to consider these 3 undeniable facts:
Rule of Law: If a rule is not in the written T&C, it does not exist. The casino cannot penalize a player for a rule they never published.
Approval via Payment: Under Section 4.2.3, the casino must verify gameplay before paying. BetVibe already approved and paid 5 withdrawals (₹52,500) from this same session. By doing so, they officially validated my gameplay. They cannot 'un-verify' the same session now just to save ₹48,300.
AML Misuse: The casino is now citing AML Clause 5 (Suspicious Transactions) for a game win. Winning an RNG-based game (Crazy Time) is not 'Money Laundering'. Using AML as an excuse to confiscate winnings from a 6-year-old child's ICU fund is a severe ethical violation.
I am fighting for my daughter’s life in the ICU. I beg Casino Guru to not let the casino hide behind 'typos' and non-existent rules. If they paid half, they must pay the rest."