Dear Betty Wins Casino,
Thank you for the clarification. However, as per our Fair Gambling Codex, we do not believe that this confiscation is justified.
We firmly believe that access to any games restricted from use with a bonus should be prevented by the casino software. In this way, the possibility for a player to make a mistake is removed.
If for some reason the casino software does not allow for this restriction, the games should be set up in such a way that they do not contribute to the wagering requirements of the bonus, meaning that no benefit can be obtained by playing them.
If the restricted games are still accessible with the use of an active bonus, they should be set with a 0% wagering contribution as mentioned above. We do not consider it fair to confiscate winnings for playing a game that is available to be played.
Could you confirm for me that the player had played the restricted games after the bonus wagering itself was already completed?
Dear Betty Wins Casino,
Thank you for the clarification. However, as per our Fair Gambling Codex, we do not believe that this confiscation is justified.
We firmly believe that access to any games restricted from use with a bonus should be prevented by the casino software. In this way, the possibility for a player to make a mistake is removed.
If for some reason the casino software does not allow for this restriction, the games should be set up in such a way that they do not contribute to the wagering requirements of the bonus, meaning that no benefit can be obtained by playing them.
If the restricted games are still accessible with the use of an active bonus, they should be set with a 0% wagering contribution as mentioned above. We do not consider it fair to confiscate winnings for playing a game that is available to be played.
Could you confirm for me that the player had played the restricted games after the bonus wagering itself was already completed?