Summary of the Issue:
I am filing this complaint because Betonred Casino has denied my withdrawal of €1873 in real money winnings, citing insufficient proof of deposit. The casino is demanding specific "wallet account" information (name, recipient's name, transaction ID, time, date) for a cryptocurrency deposit that is impossible to provide due to the non-custodial nature of my wallet and the intermediary service used. This creates an unfair situation where legitimate winnings cannot be accessed.
2. Detailed Chronology of Events:
I made a total of three deposits to my Betonred account.
On my third deposit, I claimed the welcome bonus package.
Crucially, I subsequently won €1873 using real money funds, which remained entirely separate from the bonus money. The bonus funds were not played.
Following these winnings, I initiated a withdrawal request for the €1873.
As part of the verification process, I successfully completed a live verification session, and shortly thereafter, I received an email from Betonred confirming that my account was "successfully verified."
Despite this, I then received a subsequent email from the casino specifically requesting "proof of deposit dated 2025-05-27 07:38:17 for the amount of 191.77 EUR. It must contain your name, transaction amount, recipient's name, transaction ID, time and date."
I responded to this request by explaining my deposit method:
My deposit originated from a self-custody wallet (Enkrypt), which is a browser extension for a hardware wallet.
I clarified that, by design, self-custody wallets do not have "accounts" that store or display personal identifying information (such as my name, address, registered email, or a user ID) within their interface. Therefore, the specific screenshot information they requested from a "wallet account" is impossible to provide.
I further explained that I used EasyBit.com as an intermediary service to facilitate this deposit. This was necessary because I held Ethereum (ETH), but Betonred's site only provided Dogecoin (DOGE) as a deposit option. I sent the ETH from my Enkrypt wallet to EasyBit for conversion, and EasyBit then forwarded the DOGE to Betonred.
To support my explanation and assist with verification, I uploaded a single document (a collage) containing:
A screenshot detailing the EasyBit transaction.
A selfie for identity verification.
A copy of my passport.
Proof of my email address.
Despite providing this comprehensive information, Betonred Casino has stated that it is "not good enough" and continues to deny my withdrawal.
3. The Core Problem and Argument for Unfairness:
This situation presents a significant and unfair challenge to legitimate players using cryptocurrency:
Impossible Demands: The casino is demanding proof of deposit in a format that is inherently impossible for a non-custodial wallet. A self-custody wallet does not have a "wallet account" with personal details displayed in its interface like a bank statement or a centralized exchange account.
Summary of the Issue:
I am filing this complaint because Betonred Casino has denied my withdrawal of €1873 in real money winnings, citing insufficient proof of deposit. The casino is demanding specific "wallet account" information (name, recipient's name, transaction ID, time, date) for a cryptocurrency deposit that is impossible to provide due to the non-custodial nature of my wallet and the intermediary service used. This creates an unfair situation where legitimate winnings cannot be accessed.
2. Detailed Chronology of Events:
I made a total of three deposits to my Betonred account.
On my third deposit, I claimed the welcome bonus package.
Crucially, I subsequently won €1873 using real money funds, which remained entirely separate from the bonus money. The bonus funds were not played.
Following these winnings, I initiated a withdrawal request for the €1873.
As part of the verification process, I successfully completed a live verification session, and shortly thereafter, I received an email from Betonred confirming that my account was "successfully verified."
Despite this, I then received a subsequent email from the casino specifically requesting "proof of deposit dated 2025-05-27 07:38:17 for the amount of 191.77 EUR. It must contain your name, transaction amount, recipient's name, transaction ID, time and date."
I responded to this request by explaining my deposit method:
My deposit originated from a self-custody wallet (Enkrypt), which is a browser extension for a hardware wallet.
I clarified that, by design, self-custody wallets do not have "accounts" that store or display personal identifying information (such as my name, address, registered email, or a user ID) within their interface. Therefore, the specific screenshot information they requested from a "wallet account" is impossible to provide.
I further explained that I used EasyBit.com as an intermediary service to facilitate this deposit. This was necessary because I held Ethereum (ETH), but Betonred's site only provided Dogecoin (DOGE) as a deposit option. I sent the ETH from my Enkrypt wallet to EasyBit for conversion, and EasyBit then forwarded the DOGE to Betonred.
To support my explanation and assist with verification, I uploaded a single document (a collage) containing:
A screenshot detailing the EasyBit transaction.
A selfie for identity verification.
A copy of my passport.
Proof of my email address.
Despite providing this comprehensive information, Betonred Casino has stated that it is "not good enough" and continues to deny my withdrawal.
3. The Core Problem and Argument for Unfairness:
This situation presents a significant and unfair challenge to legitimate players using cryptocurrency:
Impossible Demands: The casino is demanding proof of deposit in a format that is inherently impossible for a non-custodial wallet. A self-custody wallet does not have a "wallet account" with personal details displayed in its interface like a bank statement or a centralized exchange account.