Thank you all for your responses.
I have reviewed this case carefully, and there are some questionable actions on both sides that contributed to the confusion.
Allow me to share my thoughts on the situation and convey what we could consider a reasonable consensus.
This situation developed from the initial email promotion, which caused issues for other players as well.
As we have already discussed a similar case with the casino team previously, we believe the promotion email already addressed an essential element—maximum winnings—in a way that a player reasonably relies upon when deciding whether to participate or not. While we understand that the situation most likely resulted from an unintentional lack of clarity in the email’s wording by the marketing team, thus this cannot be considered deliberate misleading, especially when the information of the Bonus T&Cs and the General T&Cs that apply was clearly present in the email. This information most likely played a significant role in your decision to claim the bonus, and it is reasonable to assume that, had the limitations been clear from the outset, you may have chosen not to accept the offer and instead play elsewhere.
Our intention is not to overlook the operator’s perspective or the operational realities involved (the T&Cs), but rather to balance them with the player’s reasonable expectations and experience. With this in mind, we believe you have a valid basis for expecting the winnings to be paid in full.
That said, the winnings you are currently disputing from the additional deposit of €40 represent a different matter altogether.
As has already been communicated by the casino team:
06.12.2025 00:49:12
A bet of EUR 1.20 was placed using bonus funds on The Dog House, which triggered 16 free spins. The game was exited before the free spins were credited to the account.
06.12.2025 11:54:40
The winnings were limited to EUR 500 in accordance with the bonus terms and conditions (10x rule)
06.12.2025 23:37:29
A deposit of EUR 40 was made.
06.12.2025 23:41:43
Winnings from the 16 free spins, totaling EUR 74.34, were credited to the account. As the bet was placed with bonus funds, the winnings were credited to the bonus balance.
07.12.2025 01:52:16
The deposited balance was lost, and player continued using the bonus funds.
This refers to a strategy known as "delayed rounds", which is categorized as a prohibited tactic/gameplay according to industry standards; therefore, this renders you ineligible for any additional winnings.
That being noted, the initial winnings (€700) that you appear to have earned legitimately should be paid out to you in their entirety.
Given that you have already received €500, the outstanding €200 should be regarded as a resolution of the matter.
Dear BetBeast Casino,
I look forward to your feedback.
Thank you all for your responses.
I have reviewed this case carefully, and there are some questionable actions on both sides that contributed to the confusion.
Allow me to share my thoughts on the situation and convey what we could consider a reasonable consensus.
This situation developed from the initial email promotion, which caused issues for other players as well.
As we have already discussed a similar case with the casino team previously, we believe the promotion email already addressed an essential element—maximum winnings—in a way that a player reasonably relies upon when deciding whether to participate or not. While we understand that the situation most likely resulted from an unintentional lack of clarity in the email’s wording by the marketing team, thus this cannot be considered deliberate misleading, especially when the information of the Bonus T&Cs and the General T&Cs that apply was clearly present in the email. This information most likely played a significant role in your decision to claim the bonus, and it is reasonable to assume that, had the limitations been clear from the outset, you may have chosen not to accept the offer and instead play elsewhere.
Our intention is not to overlook the operator’s perspective or the operational realities involved (the T&Cs), but rather to balance them with the player’s reasonable expectations and experience. With this in mind, we believe you have a valid basis for expecting the winnings to be paid in full.
That said, the winnings you are currently disputing from the additional deposit of €40 represent a different matter altogether.
As has already been communicated by the casino team:
06.12.2025 00:49:12
A bet of EUR 1.20 was placed using bonus funds on The Dog House, which triggered 16 free spins. The game was exited before the free spins were credited to the account.
06.12.2025 11:54:40
The winnings were limited to EUR 500 in accordance with the bonus terms and conditions (10x rule)
06.12.2025 23:37:29
A deposit of EUR 40 was made.
06.12.2025 23:41:43
Winnings from the 16 free spins, totaling EUR 74.34, were credited to the account. As the bet was placed with bonus funds, the winnings were credited to the bonus balance.
07.12.2025 01:52:16
The deposited balance was lost, and player continued using the bonus funds.
This refers to a strategy known as "delayed rounds", which is categorized as a prohibited tactic/gameplay according to industry standards; therefore, this renders you ineligible for any additional winnings.
That being noted, the initial winnings (€700) that you appear to have earned legitimately should be paid out to you in their entirety.
Given that you have already received €500, the outstanding €200 should be regarded as a resolution of the matter.
Dear BetBeast Casino,
I look forward to your feedback.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin