Hello Samuel,
Thank you for your response.
To answer your questions:
- Could you please specify exactly which transaction(s) or deposits from the player’s submitted bank statements are considered insufficient or unverified for Source of Funds purposes?
As per the last message, we are referring to Source of Wealth and not Source of Funds.
SOF (Source of Funds) — A document (or a set of documents) showing the origin of the funds used for depositing in our casino, for example: salary statement, proof of business ownership, sale of property, inheritance payment, or divorce settlement (covering the last three months).
SOW (Source of Wealth) — A document (or a set of documents) showing how the player accumulated their overall wealth over time, for example: employment history and salary records, proof of business ownership, sale of property documentation, inheritance paperwork, or divorce settlement documents (bank statements alone cannot serve as SOW evidence).
- If the February and March bank statements were already provided, please confirm whether they were fully reviewed and if so, what specific gaps remain that still prevent completion of verification.
The player’s bank statements were reviewed and approved; there are no gaps in them. However, because a Source of Wealth has been requested, bank statements alone are not sufficient to satisfy SOW requirements. Acceptable SOW evidence includes items such as salary statements, proof of business ownership, property sale documentation, inheritance paperwork, or a divorce settlement.
- Additionally, could you clarify whether the ongoing requests represent a continuation of the original verification scope, or if this is now a new and expanded compliance request beyond the initial 15-day requirement mentioned earlier?
As per our Terms and Conditions, which the player agreed to at registration, "7.4 We reserve the right to carry out verification procedures for each client at first withdrawal and anytime further, depending on our internal decision, without any explanations to the player about the reasons for such request. Such verifications may, for example, include copies of a player’s passport, national Identity Card, copies of a player’s utility bills, and/or copies of the debit/credit cards used to deposit." Therefore, the current request falls within our contractual verification rights.
Also, if the player's funds were confiscated, it does not mean that this is final. We are trying to resolve the case in the best way possible; this is why we requested additional documents and clarifications so we can review the matter in more detail and proceed further. We cannot continue without the player’s cooperation. At the moment, we are awaiting the Source of Wealth document(s) and completed questionnaire, after which we can continue with the case.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Best regards,
BDM Bet Casino
Hello Samuel,
Thank you for your response.
To answer your questions:
- Could you please specify exactly which transaction(s) or deposits from the player’s submitted bank statements are considered insufficient or unverified for Source of Funds purposes?
As per the last message, we are referring to Source of Wealth and not Source of Funds.
SOF (Source of Funds) — A document (or a set of documents) showing the origin of the funds used for depositing in our casino, for example: salary statement, proof of business ownership, sale of property, inheritance payment, or divorce settlement (covering the last three months).
SOW (Source of Wealth) — A document (or a set of documents) showing how the player accumulated their overall wealth over time, for example: employment history and salary records, proof of business ownership, sale of property documentation, inheritance paperwork, or divorce settlement documents (bank statements alone cannot serve as SOW evidence).
- If the February and March bank statements were already provided, please confirm whether they were fully reviewed and if so, what specific gaps remain that still prevent completion of verification.
The player’s bank statements were reviewed and approved; there are no gaps in them. However, because a Source of Wealth has been requested, bank statements alone are not sufficient to satisfy SOW requirements. Acceptable SOW evidence includes items such as salary statements, proof of business ownership, property sale documentation, inheritance paperwork, or a divorce settlement.
- Additionally, could you clarify whether the ongoing requests represent a continuation of the original verification scope, or if this is now a new and expanded compliance request beyond the initial 15-day requirement mentioned earlier?
As per our Terms and Conditions, which the player agreed to at registration, "7.4 We reserve the right to carry out verification procedures for each client at first withdrawal and anytime further, depending on our internal decision, without any explanations to the player about the reasons for such request. Such verifications may, for example, include copies of a player’s passport, national Identity Card, copies of a player’s utility bills, and/or copies of the debit/credit cards used to deposit." Therefore, the current request falls within our contractual verification rights.
Also, if the player's funds were confiscated, it does not mean that this is final. We are trying to resolve the case in the best way possible; this is why we requested additional documents and clarifications so we can review the matter in more detail and proceed further. We cannot continue without the player’s cooperation. At the moment, we are awaiting the Source of Wealth document(s) and completed questionnaire, after which we can continue with the case.
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Best regards,
BDM Bet Casino