Casino: 1win
Issue: Bonus winnings confiscated without a clear rule
I deposited 5,000 KZT and received a 30% bonus (1,500 KZT).
My deposit balance was lost, after which I continued playing with the bonus balance.
During gameplay, my bonus balance decreased to approximately 300 KZT. I placed a bet using the remaining bonus funds and won 12,600 KZT.
However, the winnings were not credited. Instead, the bonus was marked as annulled.
The casino claims that the bonus was "lost" because the wagering requirements were not completed and because the entire bonus balance was used in a single bet.
However, at the time of participation, the bonus terms did NOT contain any rule that:
• prohibits using the full bonus balance in one bet (all-in),
• states that a winning bet can be considered a "loss",
• states that winnings from a successful bet are annulled if wagering is incomplete.
The casino support repeatedly states that the "bonus balance was lost", despite the fact that the actual result of the bet was a win, not a loss.
They were unable to provide any specific rule that allows treating a winning bet as a losing one or confiscating the winnings in this situation.
I believe the casino applied an unstated or retroactive rule and misinterpreted the concept of "loss" to justify confiscation.
Requested resolution:
Credit the winnings obtained from the successful bet or provide a clear reference to a specific bonus rule that explicitly allows such confiscation.
The casino failed to provide a concrete rule reference despite multiple requests.
Casino: 1win
Issue: Bonus winnings confiscated without a clear rule
I deposited 5,000 KZT and received a 30% bonus (1,500 KZT).
My deposit balance was lost, after which I continued playing with the bonus balance.
During gameplay, my bonus balance decreased to approximately 300 KZT. I placed a bet using the remaining bonus funds and won 12,600 KZT.
However, the winnings were not credited. Instead, the bonus was marked as annulled.
The casino claims that the bonus was "lost" because the wagering requirements were not completed and because the entire bonus balance was used in a single bet.
However, at the time of participation, the bonus terms did NOT contain any rule that:
• prohibits using the full bonus balance in one bet (all-in),
• states that a winning bet can be considered a "loss",
• states that winnings from a successful bet are annulled if wagering is incomplete.
The casino support repeatedly states that the "bonus balance was lost", despite the fact that the actual result of the bet was a win, not a loss.
They were unable to provide any specific rule that allows treating a winning bet as a losing one or confiscating the winnings in this situation.
I believe the casino applied an unstated or retroactive rule and misinterpreted the concept of "loss" to justify confiscation.
Requested resolution:
Credit the winnings obtained from the successful bet or provide a clear reference to a specific bonus rule that explicitly allows such confiscation.
The casino failed to provide a concrete rule reference despite multiple requests.