Blizz Casino Review

The player from Ireland won a significant amount at Blizz Casino and provided all needed documents for verification. After numerous excuses for non-payment and delayed partial payments, the casino claimed the player played a restricted game using bonus money, which the player denies, insisting the game was allowed at the time.

The player from Thailand had experienced a delay with a withdrawal of $10,000, even though he had passed all requested verifications. The casino was not providing a clear reason for the delay. After the player had provided necessary information, we engaged the casino for clarification. Despite multiple attempts, the casino did not respond to our queries. Due to the lack of cooperation from the casino, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved'. We recommended the player to contact the Curaçao Antillephone N.V. for further assistance.

The player from Japan had experienced a delay in withdrawing his winnings of approximately $10,000 worth of LTC from Blizz.io due to allegations of opposite betting. Despite having received a supportive email from the casino after making a mistake in bet placement, all his plays were declared as betting on opposite, and his withdrawal request had been declined. We had attempted to contact the casino multiple times to resolve the issue, but received no response. As a result, the complaint had been marked as 'unresolved', which might have negatively affected the casino's rating. We had advised the player to submit a complaint to the Antillephone Curacao Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from California had his account banned after he had attempted to withdraw winnings from an online casino. He had used a VPN set to New Zealand to play but claimed the casino had told him they didn't check for VPN usage. He had provided all necessary documentation for account verification, including his California driver's license. Despite his efforts, his withdrawal request had been denied and his account had been subsequently closed for playing from a restricted country. He had reached out to the casino's support but had received no response. We had tried to mediate the issue by contacting the casino multiple times but had received no response. The complaint had been marked as 'unresolved' due to the lack of cooperation from the casino. We recommended the player contact the Antillephone Curacao Gaming Authority for further assistance.

The player from Switzerland had been waiting for his withdrawal of 13100 USDT from blizz.io casino for over a month. He reported having frequent and repetitive responses from customer support with no resolution, and felt like he was being ignored. The player's account had been verified a month ago and he had been depositing since mid-2022, but this was his first withdrawal request. The winnings had been accumulated using a bonus, which was fully wagered according to the casino's terms. Despite our attempts to resolve the issue, the casino did not respond. We marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which might have negatively affected the casino's rating. The player was advised to wait for the regulator's decision.

The player from Switzerland had managed to wager his bonus and had gotten his account verified. However, despite being suggested to withdraw a specific amount by the support, he had waited for ten days for his withdrawal. The player had been advised to wait for 14 days for the withdrawal process. After the waiting period, the player still hadn't received his winnings. We had intervened by contacting the casino and extending the timer for the casino's response. The casino had been given 48 hours to process the payment. Eventually, the player had confirmed receipt of his second and final payment. The issue had thus been successfully resolved.

A player from the United States deposited via cryptocurrency. However, some slot games were blocked, so he inquired with the live chat about the issue and was advised to use a VPN. The player won a significant amount of money, wanted to withdraw it, and had to undergo the KYC process. The casino discovered that the player had been from a restricted country, the United States, which led to confiscation of the winnings and the deposit. The mediator ruled in favor of the player due to being misled by LiveChat agent regarding the use of the VPN and being allowed to register without any warning.

The player from the United Kingdom requested a withdrawal. The payment has not yet been received as the casino is running gameplay investigations. The player did not respond to our questions, so we had to reject the complaint.

The player from Argentina requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.