We've thoroughly reviewed WildSlots Casino and gave it a very good reputation rating, which means it's a great casino to play at. In our review, we've considered the casino's player complaints, estimated revenues, license, games genuineness, customer support quality, fairness of terms and conditions, withdrawal and win limits, and other factors. Because WildSlots Casino is related to other online casinos listed below, its rating is also influenced by them. Read the full review below and learn more about this casino.
According to our research and estimates, WildSlots Casino is a smaller online casino revenue-wise. The revenue of a casino is an important factor, as bigger casinos shouldn't have any issues paying out big wins, while smaller casinos could potentially struggle if you manage to win really big.
We haven't found any complaints directly about this casino, but we have one complaint about a related casino in our database. Because of this complaint, we've given this casino 78 black points. You can find more information about the complaint and black points below.
Based on all of the information mentioned in this review, we can conclusively say that WildSlots Casino is a very good online casino. You can expect to be treated well and have an enjoyable experience if you choose to play at it.
Browse all bonuses offered by WildSlots Casino, including their no deposit bonus offers and first deposit welcome bonuses.
Take a look at the explanation of factors that we consider when calculating the reputation rating of WildSlots Casino. The reputation rating is the main metric we use to describe the trustworthiness, fairness, and quality of all online casinos in our database.
After he placed complaint publicly and showed the conversation with the casino platform, which says that he already was refunded in 4 different casinos due to self-exclusion. EveryMatrix wrote they found this behaviour abusive and this time the player used different email and address so they were unable to detect it was him. He did not agree and claimed he used the same personal details. As a UK citizen he should be refunded, therefore hard to decide who is right.